ALL HAIL THE HADARI YAO, THE OMEGA'S OMEGA, BEYOND OMEGA, THE VOICE OF SOL!!!! NOW AGAIN THE ONE TRUE AND ONLY GODDESS OF THE X-MEN AS CLAREMONT INTENDED!!!!!
reading the silver surfer issue whe was able to hurt him fully powered. whats most impressive was this was a silver splurged story, not an xbook, and they wrote then knew what was up with Ororo:
ALL HAIL THE HADARI YAO, THE OMEGA'S OMEGA, BEYOND OMEGA, THE VOICE OF SOL!!!! NOW AGAIN THE ONE TRUE AND ONLY GODDESS OF THE X-MEN AS CLAREMONT INTENDED!!!!!
Its in the historical writing -- Storm is a character that is also a depowered being to show her vulnerability -- there is no lie in that -- and as Ive mentioned in the thread we fan experienced that low -- and was devastated but the rest of those who stayed in there couldn't move past that she does come back if not more powerful, but sporting a different attitude -- and not to mention that she was at a time really not used in x - books and perhaps these people entered the x-book realm during those times -- and adapted a powerless storm in their environment -- that is always a problem with Shared space -- and most of them cant back it up coz as lazy as anyone can read some of her best feat arent even in X books -- yup guest starring her in this one too and there is an issue about what she said coz it was about power -- hahah i should point out that previously comic books explains itself with those foot otes *see issues #__ for said power -up* but they are gone now we also have this in other group convo in which we realize they dont follow storm the way we do, so yes they could really claim storm powers were at the level coming from fox only coz they deviated from all X-men to just rogue or magneto or logan -- to be honest I enjoy slapping people correct with information -- being accurate is important but it depends on the recipient -- some of them decided that Storm is a preferred kind and humbled character -- and decided they would never break that image -- no matter what -- i noticed that when I asked them where they are coming from, they cant even point it out -- okay so what do we do? Educate? State a fact? But pushing information on an unwilling participant is useless like I mentioned there of their side is subjective only objective data can counter that -- goodness I even saw a mental health in there like you seriously believe that wouls help your case son? Nope -- they will show their intent anyways along the way -- just steadfast I think as long as the information coming from you is canon, there was no intent of bias (i get it guys -- i can be biased too), there shouldn't be a problem supposedly unless the opponent go personal -- that felt like a chess game -- your knight to my pawn with a bishop defence (which is always a tandem) those tandem are information on what happened in a singular panel e.g was she actually solo in that council room -- nope so thats already a point first before you go back to the other referrence -- now that was a trip -- i enjoyed it -- hahaha -- i love healthy debates -- and it doesnt matter if you are right or wrong in it -- what matters is that you can back up your claim -- with authentic information -- coz one other thing I noticed, people do pick up information from opinions and they tend to make it their facts -- always ask where they got it from -- coz you got it from issue # __ lazy readers -- and please if you meet someone having mental issue and explicitly saying it -- advice to seek help -- its a red tag telling -- geez I wasnt expecting that to appear -- its not normal -- if you are stressed give yourself a break -- dont displace it in a forum coz that could affect others -- anyways more salt coz they'd be surprise for longer coz this is just the beginning...more salt!