Well, I play in the classical sense. So it takes me a LONG time and a great deal of frustration to learn theory, but also to play the pieces and studies I'm required to learn right. And I'm not including learning scales and arpeggios and getting a handle on ear training. So yes, musicians can go pro learning purely by ear and master all sorts of blues and country licks. But I'm talking about learning stuff that's almost impossible to be learned on one's own. That's how I see magic in MY opinion. Harry Potter and Ged had to go to magic school to learn and I prefer that approach of magical training. Strange thought magic was FAKE NEWS for SO LONG in his debut movie. Only when he saw hands growing on his hands, did he start thinking that that bald broad might be on to something. What's the point of schools, if we can all be self-taught? (I can't believe I'm actually defending schools, because I actually HATED going to them as a kid, but here we are).
Maybe that chick I referred to hasn't written anything of importance, I still think she has some solid ideas on how to write fantasy fiction (in MY opinion). Sure books, comic books, card games, tabletop games, video games, cartoons, movies and television are different mediums. But since we're talking about MAGIC here, I don't think it's unreasonable to have ideas flow between them. It's already happening. I heard the next Final Fantasy game will be borrowing elements from television shows like the Witcher and Game of Thrones. And just because folks haven't had their works published themselves, doesn't mean what they write doesn't have merit. That would be like saying art critics can't criticize painters and sculptors because they don't know how to paint and sculpt themselves!
I don't mind self-learning at all. It's even harder to learn that way in my opinion. And I have no problem with Wanda learning from that big-ass book of hers. I would have preferred it if WandaVision had Agatha "hate-teaching" Wanda a little bit more, but I'm fine with how things went down.
You can't be serious thinking that I'm sexist for saying that I wasn't thrilled that Sylvie learned her magic on her own off-screen? You can't be! Hiddleston's Loki WAS taught by his mother, Frigga. I understand why you think he wasn't, but there was a deleted scene from the Dark World that sort of explained how Frigga shared her magic with her adopted son:
My preference is if men AND women are taught magic by the experts in that field. You can build interesting relationships that way, I feel. I liked Loki's dynamic with his mother. The MCU is just full of characters with "daddy issues" (this is quite prevalent in fiction in general too). I like it that Loki and Thor have an interesting relationship with their mom. I wish Marvel Studios would have explored a little bit more of Loki's relationship with Frigga in his own show. The romantic stuff in the Marvel movies and shows often feel REALLY shoehorned in for me to take too seriously. I'm REALLY enjoying the Loki series as a whole, and I'm grateful they're explaining time travel/alternate realities in a detailed AND entertaining way. But the romance between the main characters feels REALLY awkward to me (and I like Hiddleston and Di Martino)!
Oh, and thanks for telling me about Strange's innate talent for magic. I just happen to think it's very cool that Stephen is one of the very few magic users in fiction that actually had to learn magic through rigorous training because he wasn't born with any magical powers.