Page 513 of 719 FirstFirst ... 13413463503509510511512513514515516517523563613 ... LastLast
Results 7,681 to 7,695 of 10783
  1. #7681
    Jean Grey Scholar Mercury's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2021
    Location
    My mind.
    Posts
    7,172

    Default

    Then again, to Lee, the X-Men were a metaphor for the Civil Rights Movement, which was not necessarily popular nor unanimously accepted or supported at the time. It is not beyond the realm of possibility that he was also covertly championing other minorities and groups. Food for thought.

    https://www.history.com/news/stan-le...ts-inspiration

    https://www.cinemablend.com/news/256...e-x-men-comics

  2. #7682

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mercury View Post
    Then again, to Lee, the X-Men were a metaphor for the Civil Rights Movement, which was not necessarily popular nor unanimously accepted or supported at the time. It is not beyond the realm of possibility that he was also covertly championing other minorities and groups. Food for thought.

    https://www.history.com/news/stan-le...ts-inspiration

    https://www.cinemablend.com/news/256...e-x-men-comics
    There is also an old rolling stone article i have posted in the past but some imply lee wasn't being honest. Not sure why though.

    https://www.rollingstone.com/culture...erview-754889/
    Don't let anyone else hold the candle that lights the way to your future because only you can sustain the flame.
    Number of People on my ignore list: 0
    #conceptualthinking ^_^
    #ByeMarvEN

    Into the breach.
    https://www.instagram.com/jartist27/

  3. #7683
    Jean Grey Scholar Mercury's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2021
    Location
    My mind.
    Posts
    7,172

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jwatson View Post
    There is also an old rolling stone article i have posted in the past but some imply lee wasn't being honest. Not sure why though.

    https://www.rollingstone.com/culture...erview-754889/
    I was going to post that one! Also, lying about what?

  4. #7684
    Extraordinary Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Posts
    7,144

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grinning Soul View Post
    Yeah. Stan Lee was writing subtext in the 60s! (going to have to cut these because it won't let me post...)

    Back then, I'd say that he either intended to display Bobby as the youngest who still don't get why girls are so interesting or, more likely, he thought he'd have no chance with her against the older boys who were all clearly interested in her.

    Now, knowing what was revealed later, you can read it as genuine lack of interest because of his orientation. But in that case, I think he'd have thought of it, instead of saying it out loud.
    Agreed 100%.
    The 2 reasons you give are plausible and it would make much more sense to think that rather than say it out loud.
    Moreover Knowing Bobby he would probably overact to cover this and act more interested in her.Like he did w/Magik.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mercury View Post
    Oh, I agree that this "proves nothing." Neither does "talking about shopping," which to me is a qualifier used to assume that a man is gay that reveals more ignorance. Not all gay men enjoy shopping. I certainly don't. Also, it's obvious that Bobby not showing interest in Jean was meant to be attributed to his age more than anything else, seeing as he was the youngest X-Man at that point. Still, as you noted, the fact that he has been revealed to be gay does allow for this moment to be interpreted as indicative of that, which, to me, is wonderful.

    Warren and Hank were the most overt about their attraction to and affection for Jean. Scott is always depicted thinking about Jean, while Bobby is, well, Bobby, though he does marvel at her at times.
    No, I meant after the coffee and shopping bit where he says "I only came along because.... well... you know... right? ".I think that was good subtext.Can't really misinterpret it as something else IMO.

    Yes well... not a surprise, she is Jean XD.Thanks nonetheless.

    Quote Originally Posted by Grinning Soul View Post
    But that's the problem with the subtext argument. Very rarely we know what the writer actually intended, so it's almost always just a possible interpretation. Heterosexual writers might write stuff thinking it's completely innocent because they just don't see it, you know?

    I think it's safe to assume Stan didn't intend it that way. Back then, he'd have probably re-written it if it had crossed his mind it could be interpreted like that. After the publication of "Seduction of the Innocent" in 1954, comics were under heavy scrutiny.
    Another great point, I guess most of the time they could write stuff that seems w/out any subtext to them but people w/ more experience who can relate may pick up on them.

  5. #7685

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mercury View Post
    I was going to post that one! Also, lying about what?
    they were implying he was trying to be PC by saying he thought about the civil rights movement when he created the xmen and was basically trying to capitalize on it and that they disagreed that his intent with the xmen was for it to have any sort of connection to the civil rights movement.
    Don't let anyone else hold the candle that lights the way to your future because only you can sustain the flame.
    Number of People on my ignore list: 0
    #conceptualthinking ^_^
    #ByeMarvEN

    Into the breach.
    https://www.instagram.com/jartist27/

  6. #7686
    Astonishing Member Grinning Soul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    2,757

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mercury View Post
    Then again, to Lee, the X-Men were a metaphor for the Civil Rights Movement, which was not necessarily popular nor unanimously accepted or supported at the time. It is not beyond the realm of possibility that he was also covertly championing other minorities and groups. Food for thought.

    https://www.history.com/news/stan-le...ts-inspiration

    https://www.cinemablend.com/news/256...e-x-men-comics
    Hard to say, but probably not. Society was horribly prejudicious. Even psychiatry (the authority figure in mental health) considered any non-heterosexual orientation as deviations if not outright mental diseases.

    I'm happy things have evolved way passed that, of course. But it would be really unfair to expect that level of open-mindedness from Stan in the 60s. The X-Men was first published 10 years before the DSM removed the diagnosis of "homosexuality" from the 1973 version, after all. :(

  7. #7687
    Jean Grey Scholar Mercury's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2021
    Location
    My mind.
    Posts
    7,172

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grinning Soul View Post
    But it would be really unfair to expect that level of open-mindedness from Stan in the 60s. The X-Men was first published 10 years before the DSM removed the diagnosis of "homosexuality" from the 1973 version, after all.
    Frankly, I think it is presumptuous to assume otherwise, i.e., that Lee was not so open-minded. We don't know much about his personal life and whether he had friends or associates that were gay. Furthermore, we don't even know if he himself was gay. There have been plenty of closeted gay and bisexual men with wives and children who remained/remain in the closet. (I know from personal experience with some of these men.) I mean, if we are going to apply logic to this discourse, let's be logical.
    Last edited by Mercury; 09-13-2021 at 08:02 AM.

  8. #7688
    Jean Grey Scholar Mercury's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2021
    Location
    My mind.
    Posts
    7,172

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jwatson View Post
    they were implying he was trying to be PC by saying he thought about the civil rights movement when he created the xmen and was basically trying to capitalize on it and that they disagreed that his intent with the xmen was for it to have any sort of connection to the civil rights movement.
    Thanks for answering my question.

  9. #7689
    Ultimate Member Phoenixx9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    14,757

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grinning Soul View Post
    Hard to say, but probably not. Society was horribly prejudicious. Even psychiatry (the authority figure in mental health) considered any non-heterosexual orientation as deviations if not outright mental diseases.

    I'm happy things have evolved way passed that, of course. But it would be really unfair to expect that level of open-mindedness from Stan in the 60s. The X-Men was first published 10 years before the DSM removed the diagnosis of "homosexuality" from the 1973 version, after all.
    Yet for decades after the removal in the DSM, professionals still considered and treated people as if they had a diagnosed mental condition.
    [Quote Originally Posted by Thor-El 10-15-2020 12:32 PM]

    "Jason Aaron should know there is already a winner of the Phoenix Force and his name is Phoenixx9."


    Like a Red Dragon, The Phoenix shall Soar in 2024!

  10. #7690
    Astonishing Member Grinning Soul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    2,757

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mercury View Post
    Frankly, I think it is presumptuous to assume otherwise, i.e., that Lee was not so open-minded. We don't know much about his personal life and whether he had friends or associates that were gay. Furthermore, we don't even know if he himself was gay. There have been plenty of men with wives and children who were/are gay and in the closet. (I know from personal experience with some of these men.) I mean, if we are going to apply logic to this discourse, let's be logical.
    That's why I said "probably".

  11. #7691
    Astonishing Member Grinning Soul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    2,757

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phoenixx9 View Post
    Yet for decades after the removal in the DSM, professionals still considered and treated people as if they had a diagnosed mental condition.
    Yeah. Because prejudice is really hard to eliminate. :(

  12. #7692
    Jean Grey Scholar Mercury's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2021
    Location
    My mind.
    Posts
    7,172

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grinning Soul View Post
    That's why I said "probably".
    Touché....

  13. #7693
    Jean Grey Scholar Mercury's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2021
    Location
    My mind.
    Posts
    7,172

    Default

    ScreenRant doesn't officially acknowledge her excellent leadership during X-Men: Red, which is a crime, but I’ll take what I can get! Published yesterday:

    X-Men: Ranking All The Team Leaders By Leadership

    The X-Men have gone through different leaders over the years, and each of them brought new tactics to the team. Here are the best of the leaders.

    https://screenrant.com/x-men-team-le...by-leadership/


  14. #7694
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    3,453

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grinning Soul View Post
    Hard to say, but probably not. Society was horribly prejudicious. Even psychiatry (the authority figure in mental health) considered any non-heterosexual orientation as deviations if not outright mental diseases.

    I'm happy things have evolved way passed that, of course. But it would be really unfair to expect that level of open-mindedness from Stan in the 60s. The X-Men was first published 10 years before the DSM removed the diagnosis of "homosexuality" from the 1973 version, after all.
    Even if homosexuality was illegal, gay people still existed at the time. And there were certainly patterns of behavior that people exhibited that we today would immediately identify as that of a closeted gay man, but that contemporaries would not be able to pick up on. So it's entirely plausible that Stan Lee wrote Iceman as gay without even realizing it.

  15. #7695
    Ultimate Member Wiccan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    12,926

    Default

    I doubt Stan Lee wrote Iceman as gay, but didn't he basically say it was fine when it happened? That future creators were free to do what they wanted or something like that? I don't expect him to have been an ally in the 60's, but a lot of old people change/evolve their values along with society, not everyone sticks with the same thoughts their whole life. I don't think he was a homophobe or anything.

    (have no idea how this discussion came along lol)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •