Several things first those sales numbers are unreliable, they don't include digital, nor the accualy number readers bought. The only reffrencd to digital numbers is review number and download point. Both routinely beat OML witch also on digital fell much farther then ANW. This is of course no including how marvel marketed the two. OML logan was appearing in dozens of books and always front and center while laura was treated as in the background(they even forgot to us the preview pages or tell us when she's comming out.) There were alot more factors then just sales to store to judge sucess.
2 salse decreasing after issue 1 happens for ever comic. You want a steep decreasing look at retuen of wolverine even with marvels stupid varent cover order policy boosting sales.
3 wasent canncled due to sales, Logan came back and being the problem child with return being a cluster **** that was being rewten as it came out that got the name taken away and relaunched as her as x23.
Also red right hand is on original as well. I'm sure I can find dozens of revenge on the hero storys that took place before hand.
Comichron only tracks wholesale sales, not end sales, and only takes into account sales to comic shops; sales of trades are underrepresented (and are not one and done.) and digitally are not represented at all. Basically every series sharply, then steadily declines on those charts because they never represented actual interest, just how many were being purchased by shops. They are pre ordered months ahead of release and are often inflated by variant cover gimmicks that demand a certain number be purchased to get a certain number of variants.
It is a grossly incomplete view of the market and people need to stop using like it's some be all end all metric.
All New Wolverine lasted 36 issues, that is rare for an X-man solo that isn't Logan (or if you want to count them Deadpool), or any comic in recent years.
It went out of the way to highlight and demonstrate her tactical mindedness on several occasions, so don't know what you're talking about.
Context is king.
X-23's most basic surface level characteristic that any idiot should grasp: Stoicism.
I don't demand that her every minor appearance be a nuance in-depth examination of her character, but is it to much to ask she be written in Archetype?! This is storytelling 101! If you want people to stay invested in a character, you need to, at the bare minimum, write them such a way that they can plausibly be believed to be the same character!
Bendis was just shipping and Logan re-hash. Surprised Hopeless did worse than that.
All-New Wolverine needed less baby-sitting. We have Power Pack for that.
Red was a Jean book. RIP everyone else.
X-23 vol4 - s**t.
There's also Age of X-Man but Gabby somehow came out better in that.
"Cable was right!"
Just going off of memory r.e. it being an accident. Considering the retcons in Tamaki's series, maybe it was just as well that Taylor didn't go into detail r.e. the trigger scent. It wasn't my favorite arc in the series, but I didn't hate it either.
Too bad, it was a favorite of mine. Can't wait for the hardcover omnibus in any event.
Doctor Strange: "You are the right person to replace Logan."
X-23: "I know there are people who disapprove... Guys on the Internet mainly."
(All-New Wolverine #4)
Your memory isn't wrong. Taylor did say it was unintentional. And Taylor's handling of the trigger scent was just fine. He managed it a heck of a lot better than Liu, who decided to have whole populations suddenly reacting to the trigger despite the fact it's explicit that the scent is just that, and Laura had to be tortured into responding to it (it's not the trigger ITSELF that affected Laura, it's her conditioning to make whatever is marked with it dead. And no, it was NEVER a blind rage; all of her tactical faculties and intelligence were intact). AND he nicely addresses why Emma couldn't remove the conditioning; She didn't have a vial of the trigger and a helpful test subject to use it on to see what was actually happening when Laura was under it.
Five more days.
Incidentally, after the last issue of Red White and Blood, I wonder when Laura and Amiko are going to sit down and dish on Deadbeat Dad.
Last edited by Rang10; 02-19-2021 at 08:20 PM.
The new X-men #18 preview dropped today, there's not much really, page of the outside of the Vault and a coloured version of a black and white page we've already seen, with a narration by Synch.
https://64.media.tumblr.com/a4444b67...b49fc25bbc.jpg
https://64.media.tumblr.com/a76bb1d1...f989e7f9c5.jpg
https://64.media.tumblr.com/dd03b053...5bb528fc17.jpg
It’s funny, but the CotV’s new home reminds me very much of the wild Sentinel factory from Grant Morrison’s first New X-men issues. Since this is Hickman, I doubt very much that’s coincidence.
X-Men 18:
Laura's written like Logan, and I get an inkling will have a kid with synch by the end of the next issue for authorial eugenicist reasons.
Last edited by Nazrel; 02-24-2021 at 08:06 AM.
Context is king.
X-23's most basic surface level characteristic that any idiot should grasp: Stoicism.
I don't demand that her every minor appearance be a nuance in-depth examination of her character, but is it to much to ask she be written in Archetype?! This is storytelling 101! If you want people to stay invested in a character, you need to, at the bare minimum, write them such a way that they can plausibly be believed to be the same character!
Yeah, they were there in the last page of the original Supernovas arc, but Carey never followed up on it