Page 123 of 283 FirstFirst ... 2373113119120121122123124125126127133173223 ... LastLast
Results 1,831 to 1,845 of 4237

Thread: Wandavision

  1. #1831
    Chaos bringer GenericUsername's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,044

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LordUltimus View Post
    I didn't say she'd create ALL mutants, just that she would make more of them.


    Unless they're building up to retconning her for a particular dramatic moment.
    Wanda and retcon should never be heard or read in the same sentence again. All the retcons in comics damaged the character. Leave it be. And Wanda doesn't need to be reduced to mutant brood mother. It does nothing for her.
    Love is for souls, not bodies.

  2. #1832
    Astonishing Member LordUltimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    4,211

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GenericUsername View Post
    I don't think these stories are done without writers knowing what's going on. They go on retreats to discuss future stories and how they'll play out. They probably are still doing that virtually now.
    We hear about last-minute changes and cancellations all the time, it's not really that organized, to say nothing about the rivalries between different offices.

  3. #1833
    Astonishing Member LordUltimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    4,211

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ferro View Post
    dude it's over, the comics will follow suit.
    wanda and pietro will never be mutants again, each year that passes the retcon cements itself and this excelent episode was a truck full of diamond laced cement
    Last I checked, we have one episode to go.

    Quote Originally Posted by GenericUsername View Post
    Wanda and retcon should never be heard or read in the same sentence again. All the retcons in comics damaged the character. Leave it be. And Wanda doesn't need to be reduced to mutant brood mother. It does nothing for her.
    Is it really a "retcon" to put it back the way it was before? And come on, the amount of stories and in-universe importance of giving potentially millions of mutants powers is huge.

  4. #1834
    Chaos bringer GenericUsername's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,044

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LordUltimus View Post
    We hear about last-minute changes and cancellations all the time, it's not really that organized, to say nothing about the rivalries between different offices.
    Oh it's organized, just not always in the way that you'd prefer. Changes can happen but that doesn't mean that one writer doesn't know about it. Especially something that big.
    Love is for souls, not bodies.

  5. #1835
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    4,026

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LordUltimus View Post
    I didn't say she'd create ALL mutants, just that she would make more of them.


    Unless they're building up to retconning her for a particular dramatic moment.
    they aren't, the scarlet witch as a witch only has been elevated beyond any mutant/magneto connections, they didn't care about it once they regained the rights, they wont now

  6. #1836
    Chaos bringer GenericUsername's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,044

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LordUltimus View Post
    Last I checked, we have one episode to go.



    Is it really a "retcon" to put it back the way it was before? And come on, the amount of stories and in-universe importance of giving potentially millions of mutants powers is huge.
    It wasn't that way before. This version of Wanda was never a mutant or Mags kid. And her being Mags' kid in comics was a retcon.

    And one episode will likely be 47 more minutes with over an hour of credits. That's not gonna establish mutants, because that's a big deal and not something they'll want to put in a Disney+ show that isn't available to all regions.
    Love is for souls, not bodies.

  7. #1837
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    4,026

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LordUltimus View Post
    We hear about last-minute changes and cancellations all the time, it's not really that organized, to say nothing about the rivalries between different offices.
    you think hickman will spend a single page on wanda, swimming agaist the current of rival offices just so it can be retconed by any avengers book after franklin? That plus probable mcu synergy spells out what im saying

  8. #1838
    Astonishing Member LordUltimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    4,211

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ferro View Post
    you think hickman will spend a single page on wanda, swimming agaist the current of rival offices just so it can be retconed by any avengers book after franklin? That plus probable mcu synergy spells out what im saying
    He already did in Empyre.

  9. #1839
    Astonishing Member LordUltimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    4,211

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GenericUsername View Post
    It wasn't that way before. This version of Wanda was never a mutant or Mags kid. And her being Mags' kid in comics was a retcon.

    And one episode will likely be 47 more minutes with over an hour of credits. That's not gonna establish mutants, because that's a big deal and not something they'll want to put in a Disney+ show that isn't available to all regions.
    Wanda's showing up in Multiverse of Madness, they can re-establish that stuff there. Besides, I'm not talking about a confirmation, just a tease.

  10. #1840
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    4,026

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LordUltimus View Post
    He already did in Empyre.
    dragging wanda trough the mud for the high enjoyment of x-men stans isn't retconing her back lol

  11. #1841
    Astonishing Member LordUltimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    4,211

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ferro View Post
    dragging wanda trough the mud for the high enjoyment of x-men stans isn't retconing her back lol
    You made it sound like he wasn't going to write her at all.

  12. #1842
    Astonishing Member Journey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    4,636

    Default

    He kind of humiliated her and made her look inept over a situation where previously it was written as her not giving a single ****. I Kind of felt bad he lowkey did her dirty.
    Last edited by Journey; 02-26-2021 at 02:31 PM.

  13. #1843
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    4,026

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LordUltimus View Post
    You made it sound like he wasn't going to write her at all.
    I mean we were discussing the character in a somewhat positive way, so i assumed obvious bad faith writing to please bitter x-men fans isn't on the table

  14. #1844
    ᱬ Master Of Chaos ᱬ Cruelrain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2019
    Posts
    2,315

    Default

    can we stop rotting this thread with mutant stuff like it's obvious the MCU ain't touching the mutant gene unless they do something with the fake pietro from fox a the end which we don't know

  15. #1845
    Chaos bringer GenericUsername's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,044

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LordUltimus View Post
    Wanda's showing up in Multiverse of Madness, they can re-establish that stuff there. Besides, I'm not talking about a confirmation, just a tease.
    They aren't occupying Strange's solo for Wanda's origin. That is only in her show.
    Love is for souls, not bodies.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •