spoilers:end of spoilers
I also found this quote online which I agree with except for one notable exception: "Personally, I think this episode was a bit of a jump-the-shark moment for the show. It showcased every small issue I’ve been having with the series, but amplified. The lack of willingness to make Wanda an antagonist leads to this honestly underwhelming twist (no offense to Kathryn Hahn, who’s still great, but this reveal made me retroactively enjoy her “character breaking” moments less). Monica finally gets to have a great superhero moment, but it feel unearned without delving more into her relationship with her mother. Pietro disappearing wastes a more interesting development, and the isolation of Vision for an entire episode didn’t help develop any of the great tension in his relationship with Wanda that we had seen in episodes 5 and 6. It’s really frustrating to see a promising presence get more and more wasted with each episode." Now I don't have any desire at all to see Wanda be a villain, and I'm glad she won't be. But putting the blame on Agatha Harkness just rubs me the wrong way. I'm usually the first one to say that movies and shows should change things from the source material, but I don't agree with this decision. It feels cheap to me. The series is trying to do too much in my opinion and add far too many subplots. And now with only two episodes left, they have to explain each of them. And it worries me that they won't stick the landing. If the show is about family, then how come Vision has spent so little onscreen time with his kids? Why is Wanda so dismissive of her sons' concerns? The show should have focused on THAT stuff in my opinion. It's important. It's what made the Vision mini-series so great. Don't get me wrong, I really like the creativity and originality of WandaVision and the near total lack of action thus far. But I feel that some potential has definitely been squandered. And that frustrates me.