Wandavision

**Probability010** · 02-08-2021, 05:45 AM

Originally Posted by Journey

Well they probably won't have to theorize much longer I bet will find out the big bad ID on Friday episode 6 seems like the best time to do it with only 9 in the season 7-9 is a little late in the game if their hoping to establish some backstory.

That's also something I am worried about, even if its totally eclipsed by my fear of Wanda being the villain. On average, Marvel movies don't have a good track record in portraying the motivation of their villains.

**Probability010** · 02-08-2021, 06:00 AM

Originally Posted by 9th.

So what you're saying is Jimmy Woo is actually Mephisto

Originally Posted by Agent Z

Don't be ridiculous.

Aunt May is Mephisto. It's so obvious.

No, it's the bunny (the rabbit from the magic show). Who knows "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" and Anya specifically will understand. It must be bunnies

**Probability010** · 02-08-2021, 06:11 AM

Originally Posted by Sutekh

Nah. If there isn't a supervillain, then *Wanda* is the supervillain, and I don't want that. Seen the 'wimmin can't handle power and must be beat down and reminded of their place for their own good' story way too many times. Don't need to see it again.

Same for me. It's bad enough that the Wanda's bad reputation from the comics is slowly creeping into the "Movie-Version" of her.

Originally Posted by Sutekh

I'm not convinced it will be cleared up in WandaVision itself, and it's possible there won't be more than a hint that it's *someone*, who, like Thanos, will only fully appear later (in Multiverse of Madness, next year, since my money's on Nightmare).

Thanos got resurrected by his cult-followers and wants a rematch with Wanda, now that he knows who she is

**Frontier** · 02-08-2021, 09:00 AM

Originally Posted by Vegeta

Is he the overarching "big bad" for the entire phase 4 (5?) like Thanos or is he simply the villain for 1 film like Ultron or Mandarin?

It would be a waste of Kang if he isn't, but I'm not sure what they're going to do with him in an Ant-Man film.

**fin5** · 02-08-2021, 09:14 AM

maybe its anges wanda, frend. She was there when wanda was around also there for her kids growing fast maybe its wanda and anges

**LordUltimus** · 02-08-2021, 09:15 AM

Originally Posted by Frontier

It would be a waste of Kang if he isn't, but I'm not sure what they're going to do with him in an Ant-Man film.

Have his young self be a love interest for Cassie Lang, I imagine.

**Vegeta** · 02-08-2021, 09:26 AM

Originally Posted by Frontier

It would be a waste of Kang if he isn't, but I'm not sure what they're going to do with him in an Ant-Man film.

There is a lot they can do with the character, and considering that he has multiple identities throughout time (Rama Tut, Iron Lad, Immortus, and my personal favorite Scarlet Centurion.) there is a lot of fun ways to approach the character's appearances throughout the films. I was just wondering if anything concrete about him being the next "overarching villain" had been mentioned.

**gonnagiveittoya** · 02-08-2021, 10:10 AM

Originally Posted by Frontier

And the FF getting a movie pretty much means Doctor Doom is as inevitable as Thanos was.

Reportedly Doom is (or was) the planned villain for Black Panther 2.

Originally Posted by Frontier

It would be a waste of Kang if he isn't, but I'm not sure what they're going to do with him in an Ant-Man film.

With how heavily they're leaning into the Multiverse, and time travel in the MCU being the same as multiverse travel, there no way Kangs a one off. Hell, I'd bet the reason he was cast so far out is because he's coming in Loki first.

**Oberon** · 02-08-2021, 10:38 AM

Originally Posted by Probability010

No, it's the bunny (the rabbit from the magic show). Who knows "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" and Anya specifically will understand. It must be bunnies

OMGoddess! Wouldn't that be cool. Since of course Dottie seems like a possible suspect or accomplice of their own; the magic show; bunnies. An in joke that goes over everyone's head.

**Witchfan** · 02-08-2021, 10:42 AM

WandaVision Theory: Agnes Is Controlling Westview
https://www.cbr.com/wandavision-theo...ling-westview/

**Omega Alpha** · 02-08-2021, 10:45 AM

Originally Posted by Witchfan

WandaVision Theory: Agnes Is Controlling Westview
https://www.cbr.com/wandavision-theo...ling-westview/

Yeah, I don't think so. She seems to be more aware than the rest, but still not fully in control. It's either Dottie or her unseen husband.

**gurkle** · 02-08-2021, 11:30 AM

Are there any good theories about why the town doesn't have any children even though almost all the people are real?

Interesting that while Vision finally noticed this, the Exposition People don't seem to have commented on it or provided any exposition of whether or not Westview had children in it before all this started.

**Iron Maiden** · 02-08-2021, 11:32 AM

I just started watching last night after being in a bad mood after the Super Bowl. So after one episode one thing stands out to me....didn't read much of the thread to avoid spoilers. But hasn't anyone else noticed that Wanda and Vison are living in Rob and Laura Petrie's house in New Rochelle? I was expect to see Vison trip into the step down living room.

**Frontier** · 02-08-2021, 11:33 AM

Originally Posted by gurkle

Are there any good theories about why the town doesn't have any children even though almost all the people are real?

Interesting that while Vision finally noticed this, the Exposition People don't seem to have commented on it or provided any exposition of whether or not Westview had children in it before all this started.

Because part of the plan is making sure Wanda and Vision have kids and they only need the Twins?

**gurkle** · 02-08-2021, 11:35 AM

Originally Posted by Frontier

Because part of the plan is making sure Wanda and Vision have kids and they only need the Twins?

Right, but it doesn't go with the theory that this was simply a regular town that got taken over.

Thread: Wandavision

Thread Tools

Display

Posting Permissions