I reject Jack's narrow "must be Superman" definition, and see one much broader more inclusive .
A hero that has some super human abilities. That's it. The earliest hero to be that gets my vote.
I reject Jack's narrow "must be Superman" definition, and see one much broader more inclusive .
A hero that has some super human abilities. That's it. The earliest hero to be that gets my vote.
There came a time when the Old Gods died! The Brave died with the Cunning! The Noble perished locked in battle with unleashed Evil! It was the last day for them! An ancient era was passing in fiery holocaust!
Then that would be Gilgamesh. There obviously was stuff before that but that is the earliest myth to be written down and he was superhuman.
There were earlier writings. I don't know if any of them referred to superhuman beings such as gods but I'm pretty sure the Gilgamesh Epic is the oldest recorded story.
Last edited by Powerboy; 02-03-2021 at 06:17 PM.
Power with Girl is better.
There came a time when the Old Gods died! The Brave died with the Cunning! The Noble perished locked in battle with unleashed Evil! It was the last day for them! An ancient era was passing in fiery holocaust!
At this point, people are refusing to distinguish a hero from a superhero, and basically just playing fast and lose with categories so that nothing has any meaning anymore.
Or not narrowly defining superhero to only fit Superman.
There came a time when the Old Gods died! The Brave died with the Cunning! The Noble perished locked in battle with unleashed Evil! It was the last day for them! An ancient era was passing in fiery holocaust!
And yet there are characters who fit every needed factor. Because they are also mythical or pulp does not automatically mean they do not also meet the qualities of a superhero.
Rather than a definition that simply takes the qualities of Superman and says, that's the definition of a superhero, we're just asking two questions.
One: Would the individual be considered a hero?
Two: Is he superhuman?
For it to have any meaning, you have to define what qualifies a character as a superhero. What would prove they are a superhero? How would it be disproven? The Scientific method.
To say a character meets every reasonable requirement but they don't count because Superman has to be literally the first, not just the first to popularize the term or the best, is meaningless.
You presented a list of requirements to qualify as a superhero. It was shown there were characters that fit that list. Then you expanded the list of requirements. When a character still qualified, you expanded it again.
You've ignored that, by your own requirements, plenty of superheroes don't qualify as superheroes. The FF don't have secret IDs which was one of your requirements. You even disqualified characters that don't normally fight superhuman opponents which was your last new requirement when someone still qualified who was before Superman.
Sorry, it's pretty obvious you will disqualify anybody who is not Superman regardless of specific factors because you esoterically feel he is the first when I think you really mean the best and the one who popularized the word. So, yes, this is pointless.
Power with Girl is better.
I suppose that is important, yes, but it detracts from the argument a little bit. In that it suggests that the term "superhero" was applied to Superman retroactively, which would mean that we would have to count characters/people that fit the bill that appeared before Superman regardless of when the term was popularized.
Gilgamesh the person isn't a myth. He is a semi-historical person attested to in other sources like inscriptions and the Sumerian Kings List. He is more like King David or Alexander the Great in that the Epic of Gilgamesh like the Book of Samuel or the Alexander Romance are constructed as a genre that tries to justify the position of a current ruler through the glorification of a larger than life ancestor/predecessor.
First name i thought of is Hercules. Not cause he's the oldest super powered dude around, cause he isn't, but cause he pretty much was the ancient world equivalent of a popular comic book character in terms of how he was perceived by people back then.
He was superman and his stories were talked about as we talk about comic stories now.
That's true. I think the only connection between the name Gilgamesh, the historical figure, and the myth, is the name. I don't think we know anything about the historical person except he was a king.
Anyway, I think the thread would have gone better had the question not been, "Who, before Superman, was a superhero regardless that the term didn't exist yet?" It would have been better to just ask, "Who were the most significant forerunners of Superman?" or even, "What characters were strong influences on the character known as Superman?"
Power with Girl is better.
There came a time when the Old Gods died! The Brave died with the Cunning! The Noble perished locked in battle with unleashed Evil! It was the last day for them! An ancient era was passing in fiery holocaust!
Power with Girl is better.