I didn't know Hickman had a thing for 90's X-Men. If he was going for an Image kind of style, why Booth? Should have waited for Marc Silvestri. That Storm move, awesome as it was succeeded in spite of Booth's confusing panels.
I didn't know Hickman had a thing for 90's X-Men. If he was going for an Image kind of style, why Booth? Should have waited for Marc Silvestri. That Storm move, awesome as it was succeeded in spite of Booth's confusing panels.
The current Sh'iar empire has built its wealth and resources of enslaving other civilisations. A massive recession has occured and those planets see no return. The Imperial Guard recruits champions of each of those communities enslaved. Just because the face of the monarchy has changed the advisors re Deathbird and power structures of oppression and imperialism remain.
For me what was missing in this less plot important, more one-off adventure was the character arcs. One off issues are great and don't need to move forward a big bad or anything, but they should still move characters and relationships forward. I don't know what the characters are doing in this run aside from responding to events as they happen.
I am guessing storm no longer being a glass cannon is not going down well with you.
😂😂😂🍸
Like I have said on Twitter with storm getting defence these battle threads won't last majority of the time.
If you go back to Hickman's F4 run, the first handful of issues felt like one-offs initially but they eventually tied together at the climax of his run. Prior to X of Swords, many of the flagship issues were one-offs (just think about the Horde culture issue, children of the Vault etc. He's laying groundwork down for another arc down the road