Originally Posted by
Ascended
The guy does, sort of, have a point. Like, we have the Next Batman who's black. That book will sell because it's the Bat, but it's not building up Jace's franchise, it's building up Batman's, and Batman will always, ultimately, be a white dude named Bruce. Meanwhile, where's the Black Lightning, Vixen, or Cyborg solo ongoings? Sam being Cap builds up a franchise that, end of the day, is about Steve, while Sam's Falcon moniker is left to languish. So sure, the dude *sort of* has a point.
But that's only *sometimes.* And mostly only applies to comics (movies, like I said, are different). How about Miles Morales? Jessica Cruz? Michael Holt? The problem here isn't that the guy is saying the Sam-Cap situation "can" be a negative, it's that he's saying it's *always* a negative, and we damn well know better, because we've seen situations like this be successful and expand representation. You can't paint every narrative about legacy with the same brush.
And of course, the lack of any positive videos is a pretty huge hint. If you got nothing nice to say, ever, then your complaints are just sound and fury, without substance. And I think a lot of people are using these kinds of arguments, ones that sound rational and reasonable on the surface, to push a hateful and regressive agenda. Look at what this dude is apparently doing (I won't look at his videos and give him the click); bitching about PoC taking up legacies, getting the spotlight, whatever, because it's pandering (or whatever he's saying) but he's silent about any success PoC get. So if he gets his way, what are we left with? It won't be a world where PoC are properly represented on the comic shelf, will it?