I guess. But I think it's not necessarily bad if heroes are challenged on their beliefs by other heroes.
But I think the heroes can still challenge thr actual viains in terms of accountability, instead of the reverse
People say they like flawed heroes, but will also complain if the heroes get their comeuppance
I'd say Sam tries to hold Karli, John and Zemo accountable. So we might see more of that in Cap 4.
To me, the big 3(Cap, Tony, Thor) lend themselves to that kind of storytelling.
I hope so. The whole "accountability is a threat" business is tiresome
I do kinda wonder if Walker would be on Zemo's radar even if he knew. maybe when he was Captain America but I have a feeing as US Agent that presumably just follows orders from the govt or some other kind of organization, so long as said orders Walker is getting isn't destructive, I think Zemo would let him go about his own way. I think part of the reason he also went agains the Avengers is for revenge on having Stark see his group be broken and maybe also blames them for basically letting Stark do it, if not directly but indirectly for fueling the group's ego in that they are above the law and can do whatever they believe is right.
The whole Zemo becoming a Baron thing amuses me.
Technically, he's only a Baron because Ultron dropped a city on his dad (and wife and son), and he inherited the job. But he doesn't seem inclined to be grateful.
And now he says that Sokovia has been swallowed up by surrounding countries and no longer exists. (One of those surrounding countries *IS* going to be revealed to be Latveria. Fight me.) So he's not really much of a Baron anyway, since I'm pretty sure noble titles conferred by countries that don't exist are worth exactly bupkiss.
I wonder if it could be that we never saw his murder-butler back in the day because the murder-butler was off doing other stuff. The MCU has been good at digging back into it's own past, using Chitauri tech in the first Spider-Man movie, using Tony's 'BARF' holographic stuff in the second Spider-Man movie, etc. so it could be funny to find out that Zemo's flunky was active behind the scenes in the Civil War days, setting stuff up or gathering intel or whatever.
Who says they don't?
Nearly all MCU villains die fighting because Marvel movies adhere to standard action movie logic. If the good guy doesn't finish the bad guy once and for all, what was the point? Where's the finality? The vast majority of MCU fans are movie fans and not comic fans so this isn't a problem for them.
In the MCU going to jail means they are probably going to use that villain again. Loki is the classic example of this and Zemo was the latest example of it. Abomination got sent to jail in the second Hulk movie and is still there, mainly because the writers forgot all about him. Vulture may be an exception because I don't know that Michael Keaton will come back even if they want him to.
Every other Marvel villain has gotten action movie'd.
Last edited by Vic Vega; 05-03-2021 at 08:19 AM.
Minor disagreement.
Marvel villains die because their evil has to be answered in turn. Hela, Ultron et all loved to kick themselves some puppies. They had to get crotch kicked by karma.
Doing the same to Loki and Zemo, who were sympathetic, would seem like overkill. Zemo had lost his family, while Loki returns home in disgrace. Death isn't the same punishment for them that it is for others.