When did being D-list in the comics mattered in the MCU? The movies elevated some villains beyond their station in the comics. Kaecilius wasn't anyone who can take Strange in the comics but he's the primary villain of his film. Ghost is nowhere as dangerous in the comics as that character was in Ant-Man and Wasp.
Sharon being Power Broker could put respect in that name.
Well, I do like the actress playing Sharon Carter, so there is that. She has been pretty convincing even through all of her twists and turns. And her character seems pretty nuanced - all that stuff about the government not backing her up and not being able to speak to her family seems like it was a sympathy lie just to get Bucky and Falcon on her side. So even though her "power broker" identity might be C-List, it seems like she will ultimately be much more than that. Probably not Hydra but maybe AIM?
Every day is a gift, not a given right.
For every Ghost, there is a Kaecelius who barely went anywhere after his film, even with freakin’ Mads playing him, or Yellowjacket being a combination of two character that also gets forgot, or wasted headliners like the Mandarin (before whoever at Marvel wised up and realized that they could afford two variations thanks to Black’s script, whether before or after the film’s reception.)
Van Camp playing a lazily motivated and mundane heel in reaction to her original planned role not working out is a waste. If they want her to be evil and play to Van Camp’s strengths, something more than “...maybe nobody vouched for her in the Blip?” should be her motivation, and they should do more than give her pants-suited villainy.
Like action, adventure, rogues, and outlaws? Like anti-heroes, femme fatales, mysteries and thrillers?
I wrote a book with them. Outlaw’s Shadow: A Sherwood Noir. Robin Hood’s evil counterpart, Guy of Gisbourne, is the main character. Feel free to give it a look: https://read.amazon.com/kp/embed?asi...E2PKBNJFH76GQP