"Never assign to malice what is adequately explained by stupidity or ignorance."
"Great stories will always return to their original forms"
"Nobody is more dangerous than he who imagines himself pure in heart; for his purity, by definition, is unassailable." James Baldwin
What this thread has done for me is to convince me that DC needs to finally do a definitive origin story for PG, from Krypton to Earth 2 or New Earth, whichever they want. But even I get a bit confused with the multiple versions of a rather poorly defined character, and I've been a fan for a while now. For me, one of Power Girl's big advantages as a character is that she's still got a lot to fill in, and that can enable a clever writer to set her up for success by giving her a detailed origin, more character details, and perhaps a mission. And it will clear up for everyone a lot of stuff that's a bit murky.
A nice mini would do it, I should think.
And what htis thread made realize is than Powergirl had more potential as character than Supergirl and DC knew it. DC knew it so much than in the New52 they interchanged of both heroines! (Sans the coming from other earth, naturally): In the new52 Supergirl adapted the origin of Powergirl as own, with her reaching earth already grown, hating Superman and being hiperagressive and in Worlds Finest, Powergirl was transformed into a bland Supergirl who was adopted and raised by Superman and Lois.
"Never assign to malice what is adequately explained by stupidity or ignorance."
"Great stories will always return to their original forms"
"Nobody is more dangerous than he who imagines himself pure in heart; for his purity, by definition, is unassailable." James Baldwin
Of course she has potential, and IMO too more than SG. And it also irritated me when I saw them taking so much from PG's character and clumsily grafting it onto SG. But as I said, she's as close to a blank slate that a clever author could make his or her own huge imprint on, a character a good writer could make their name on. And a character a clever writer with support from DC could turn into a major character in DC's pantheon.
Well, the only way I can think of to simplify is to simply reboot everything, but a hard reboot this time with clean breaks. None of this "everything's changed, except for this, this, and this". I don't actually like that idea, but I can't think of a better one to get rid of all the versions and complexity and make sure everyone's on the same page. But...the last time they tried that...the horror....was the nu52. It should have been simple, just reset everyone who has a classic origin back to that, and give the ones who don't their own version that doesn't contradict anything that's been written about them before. But...the nu52. So....I got nothing.
Never going to work. You are always going to have new creators revising an established character's origins. That's just the nature of serialized fiction in a shared universe for both DC/Marvel. I'm sure there are examples in the MCU too. Though DC's problems where editors/creators aren't on the same page is more a management problem due to decades of terrible leadership.
Okay. To make it clear once and for all. (And put an end to this confusion)
New Earth Superman didn’t raise Powergirl (She was an adult) nor did he take her in. New Earth Superman put Powergirl under the care and observation of the JSA instead.
New Earth Superman and Power Girl are just cousins from different universes.
Is that right?
I just read the comic again.
Powergirl was about 18 when she first arrived on Earth.
So it’s definite even with that information New Earth Superman didn’t raise Powergirl like a daughter and New Earth Superman didn’t take Powergirl in.
New Earth Superman put Powergirl under the care and observation of the JSA instead.
In the end New Earth Superman and Power Girl are just cousins from different universes.
Just want to be absolutely clear. Is that all correct?
Last edited by Lupin29; 02-19-2021 at 05:52 PM.
^ Yep.
Aaand... I'm out.
"Never assign to malice what is adequately explained by stupidity or ignorance."
"Great stories will always return to their original forms"
"Nobody is more dangerous than he who imagines himself pure in heart; for his purity, by definition, is unassailable." James Baldwin
I would like to thank everyone who helped explained things to me. I'm sorry for the trouble. It was very confusing but you all helped made things much easier to understand. Thank you all so much.
I won't argue about Crisis because I largely agree. I really disagree with the relevant/not relevant thing though.
The Killing Joke, for one example, was "irrelevant" by this standard and that's just silly to me. It was obviously highly relevant. It was so much so that it was retroactively inserted into continuity. Was it irrelevant and then later relevant then? Of course not. Does Batman: Year One become irrelevant if Batman's origin story is later retold differently?
Was "Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow" irrelevant? Was The Dark Knight Returns? Kingdom Come? I could go on and on. Many (or even most) of the very best DC stories have happened outside of continuity and they have been so much more than relevant.
You'll never go wrong if you favor great stories over ones that strictly adhere to continuity.