Results 1 to 15 of 215

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #15
    Spectacular Member the COMET's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    Hardcore Station
    Posts
    160

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bored at 3:00AM View Post
    I can certainly see how many would view DC's roster, or superheroes in general, as very old fashioned. Most of them are, after all, half a century old or older. They are largely the products of white men who were often Jewish and living in NYC. These characters are shaped by their experiences growing up through the Great Depression, WW2, and the Cold War looking to make a buck from children with disposable entertainment. As a result, the characters reflect the anxieties, preoccupations, and prejudices of their times, so superheroes are overflowing with rich playboys, scientists, test pilots, spies and soldiers fighting a never-ending battle against villains that almost always evoke the Nazis.

    However, does that mean these are characters that we need to move on from in favor of newer, fresher characters that better reflect the diversity of our culture? I can certainly see that argument. It's undeniable that the adventures of straight white men have dominated the superhero market for decades to diminishing returns, particularly once the Baby Boomers fully took the creative reigns and the superhero genre became more and more focused upon itself rather than trying to reach out to newer audiences.

    This inward looking aspect of the superhero readership has also made it increasingly difficult to introduce new characters because the dwindling readership, forever obsessed with the old characters and comics they'd first fallen in love with as kids, frequently aren't interested in reading anything that isn't a retelling, reimagining, recontextualization, or continuation of those old comics.

    So, with not enough readers to showcase both the old characters and the new, what should DC do? Didio's 5G plan of aging out the older heroes in favor of replacing them with the next generation clearly wasn't something DC's current corporate overlords felt was going to work.

    I don't think there's a solution that's going to please everyone. There are simply too many great characters available to DC and not enough readers to justify giving them all time to shine. Choices are going to have to be made and there are going to be fans of certain characters left out in the cold, which will inevitably lead to resentment, bickering, and the usual nonsense.

    In the end, there's very few characters that DC has that I would call outdated. Time and time again, great creators have shown that any character can be tweaked or shown in a new light that makes them just as relevant today as they were when they were first created. All it takes is the right creators who are able to make that character feel new again.

    What do you think?
    Ok, there are some issues here. First i don't see the creators as white men, they are men, humans. Like you, me and everyone else on the planet. They created characters and stories and people liked them then and still like them now.

    Then you tried to paint the creators as villains "looking to make a buck from children with disposable entertainment". They were artists trying to make a living out of their craft worrying on providing good entertainment to kids, adults, anyone who wants to buy their comics.
    If the content was so disposable as you say, it wouldn't be a success and the characters still relevant and loved today, nearly a Century later...

    Even if all changes you said were applied and a child buy this new 'updated to current times' comics, that would make the new creators child explorers? No, right?
    So no, comics creators and sellers were never child explorers. Instead they were providing them entertainment, escapism that's so valuable specially in bad times such as war times, so people can try to keep their sanity and forget about their real life problems (instead of having their entertainment throwing them said real life problems tormenting them without rest).

    As for having new audience, I'm all for it. But if you're trying to sell a product, it's for the people who wants to buy that product. If you twist and change the product to try to appeal to people who were not interested in the first place, you might still not be able to sell to them and you risk losing all the people who were buying before you changed the product, because now it's something too different than what they liked in the first place.

    So my advice is all people who feel comics should be more accurate with the times and all that, get together and create your own Brand and sell comics exact the way you want them to be. This would be a great adventure!
    Better than taking advantage of an already stablished brand like DC and it's beloved characters, trying to twist them to becoming something else only to fulfill your selfish needs.

    Much love.
    Last edited by the COMET; 02-25-2021 at 09:01 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •