Page 9 of 21 FirstFirst ... 567891011121319 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 135 of 302
  1. #121
    Fantastic Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Comic-Reader Lad View Post
    All this talk about how a white character being white doesn't matter is troublesome on the face of it. No one would say that about any other group.

    There is nothing about Cyborg or John Stewart that says they have to be black, but I don't think it would go over so well if they tried to make them another group.

    I understand that there's tons of white superheroes and much fewer minority superheroes, but the idea that white superheroes and white people should be erased as a way to fix that has a subtext that's really unsettling.

    When neal adams was drawing him....
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by obatalla; 02-27-2021 at 11:53 AM.

  2. #122
    Put a smile on that face Immortal Weapon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Bronx, New York
    Posts
    14,040

    Default

    I was hoping this would be Icon instead of Superman.

  3. #123
    All-New Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Posts
    10

    Default Will the Ta-nehisi Coates Superman crossover with Justice League?

    ..........


    .....

  4. #124
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    15,306

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Comic-Reader Lad View Post
    All this talk about how a white character being white doesn't matter is troublesome on the face of it. No one would say that about any other group.

    There is nothing about Cyborg or John Stewart that says they have to be black, but I don't think it would go over so well if they tried to make them another group.

    I understand that there's tons of white superheroes and much fewer minority superheroes, but the idea that white superheroes and white people should be erased as a way to fix that has a subtext that's really unsettling.
    I agree. However when DC, Marvel or WHOEVER has offered original black characters-the LINE starts to the left with SOMEONE having an issue with them.

    Along with companies QUICK to give up after one setback or even success.

  5. #125
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    15,306

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amadeus Arkham View Post
    I mean...was the wider audience that familiar with Miles Morales before Into The Spider-Verse? These movies can introduce these less well known characters to a wider audience.

    Miles Morales was in a cartoon voiced by Donald Glover

    Miles had at least 5-7 trades in stores. Softcover and hardcover version. I think there was even a library version.

    Miles had anywhere from 2-5 action figures in stores.

    Miles was SEEN on Spider-Man merchandise including kid's valentines, Easter baskets, greeting cards and so on.

    Miles has a NEW YORK TIMES BEST SELLING Novel in stores.

    Miles's costume was already being made into cosplay and Halloween costumes (mainly in Japan)

    Miles was already in the public's eye before that movie was greenlighted.


    this is my issue with the superficial diversity in Hollywood. If Hollywood really cared about representation, they need to do this series right,

    make a brand new black superman not clark kent and really build it up. let the audience fall in love with this newcomer, it does not need billion dollar budget, it just needs to be a very good, well made film that covers its budget and let the sequels keeps building from that.
    The ISSUE is these studios do NOT want to write those CHECKS in the first place. Nor greenlight those movies.

    See SOME studios do NOT have an issue if a movie with a white hero (Green Lantern, Lone Ranger, John Carter or Constantine) being a FLOP.

    Those flops will NOT stop pitches for Aquaman, Shazam, Green Arrow, Superman or whoever is white.

    If it's Steel or Catwoman-they bomb it's we can't do Black Panther or Cap Marvel or Static.

    Steel and Catwoman cost a combine $117 million and made $83 million (82 for Catwoman and 1 million for Steel). $34 million loss (not counting promo and merchandise)

    John Carter costed $250 and made $284. $34 million loss. 2 movies that cost less lost the same amount as one movie with a higher budget.

    Its the folks in charge that tend to be the issue.

  6. #126
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    1,237

    Default

    I am pretty sure every studio has an issue with a movie being a flop.

  7. #127
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,924

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Triple J View Post
    Why? And who decides where the line has to be drawn?

    I don't think anyone is claiming that the problem is with Superman's race (or what he comes across as anyways). Whatever happened with Cavill's Superman is WB's fault - with their constant meddling and all.

    WB is doing this is to capture the BP market - also a clean slate (and remove the baggage associated with Cavill's Superman). For better or worse, they are simply going after the money (which is normal for studios anyways).



    Keep in mind, Clark is not actually Caucasian. He's an Alien, so his skin color could be whatever an author wants it to be. No one is saying anything about race bending actual Caucasian characters (like say Bruce Wayne). Same with Cyborg - because he's actually a Black American.

    Take Martian Manhunter for instance. He's an Alien as well (though unlike Clark, he has freedom to change his appearance and skin color at will). In either case, character's race isn't important, you can still capture the character's traits while changing their race.
    Because it is getting out of hand. Didn't they make Mr Potato Head gender neutral the other day? Come on, that is ridiculous.

    You can't go changing one to suit the other. How about we redo Alien and make Ripley a female? How about we make Steel (John Henry Irons) white? No, because if you did people would kick up a stink about it and if you think they wouldn't I have a bridge I wish to sell you.

    You can't go fixing the inequality of white characters vs minorities by swapping out one to appease the other. Actually doing so is quite disrespectful. You want more minority heroes? MAKE them. But then people go, "oh, but he is not as famous as this guy". So what? Any character can work provided the care and thought is there.

    Yes, Superman is a alien. But the character (Clark Kent) has been depicted as white from the beginning and has been that way for 83 years. I am sorry, but the very image of him is ingrained in the public conscious as that. Calvin Ellis was created to be african-american from the get-go. So it would be better if they use him.

    We are going to just have to agree to disagree on this.

  8. #128
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,924

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amadeus Arkham View Post
    Difference there though is Cyborg and Jon Stewart were created with the purpose of adding more representation to comics at the time. Superman, and really most white heroes weren’t really created to add more white male representation. Take these two Stan Lee and Jack Kirby’s creations like Black Panther and Reed Richards. Technically, one could make the same argument that you could race-bend both of these characters; Black Panther could be changed into being a white king from a fictional European country as opposed to being a black King from a fictional African nation and Reed Richards could be changed to an black scientist as opposed to a white scientist. However, it doesn’t take a genius to know which between the two changes of these characters would be much more inherently problematic. T’Challa(as the case with virtually every other non-white POC character) was specifically created with the purpose of bringing more representation to a homogeneously white comic book world. While Reed, the white character, as well as almost virtually every white comic character was not created with that specific intention in mind.

    Now there are certain white characters that race-swapping their race might be problematic(Jewish characters like Magneto and Ben Grimm come to mind) but as a whole I don’t think it’s unsettling to alter White characters race, especially when racial/ethnic representation has never been a reason for most of their creations in the first place. That being said, I would prefer if Clark remain an alien looking coincidentally like a Caucasian human instead of coindentally looking like a black human. That’s my personal preference, though but I don’t think it’ll be the end of the world if Clark Kent doesn’t look like a white person again for the gazillionlith time.
    This. Summed up my thoughts perfectly.

  9. #129
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    1,237

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Somecrazyaussie View Post
    You can't go changing one to suit the other. How about we redo Alien and make Ripley a female?
    I suspect that's a change a lot of people would be comfortable with.

  10. #130
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,924

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirby101 View Post
    The only problem with making him Calvin and not Clark is the wider audience doesn't know who Clavin is. Will they think that WB played a trick on them, calling this guy Superman who isn't the character they know from the other movies, TV and the comics they read as kids?
    His origin is similar enough. It really depends on the writing, film maker and actors they get. Miles wasn't widely known before ItSV and no one had a problem accepting that. DC does have a advantage in that they are going with a multiverse concept with multiple Batmen and so forth. So Calvin should be fine. I don't think people would feel cheated once they see him in action.

  11. #131
    the devil's reject choptop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    8,249

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by green_garnish View Post
    I suspect that's a change a lot of people would be comfortable with.
    Lol was somecrazy jokeing or does he really think Ripley is a guy?

  12. #132
    the devil's reject choptop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    8,249

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Somecrazyaussie View Post
    Abrams can direct. But, as far as writing and approaching a story go, keep him far, far away. Everything he does is derivative of other people's ideas or just outright rips off other films. TFA was just ANH with a new coat of paint. TRoS was just reheated RoTJ. Star Trek Into Darkness.... ugh that makes my blood boil.
    He is a good cinematographer writering and directing not so much.

  13. #133
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Where The Food Is.
    Posts
    2,142

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by skyvolt2000 View Post
    Miles Morales was in a cartoon voiced by Donald Glover

    Miles had at least 5-7 trades in stores. Softcover and hardcover version. I think there was even a library version.

    Miles had anywhere from 2-5 action figures in stores.

    Miles was SEEN on Spider-Man merchandise including kid's valentines, Easter baskets, greeting cards and so on.

    Miles has a NEW YORK TIMES BEST SELLING Novel in stores.

    Miles's costume was already being made into cosplay and Halloween costumes (mainly in Japan)

    Miles was already in the public's eye before that movie was greenlighted.
    Ah, there’s no denying Miles had bigger media exposure than either Cal or Val, but that doesn’t mean they can’t be successful. Filmmakers can take liberties with the character they’re adapting on film to make a more palatable for a mainstream audience. Val and Cal don’t have exactly have the strongest source material? Okay, fine. Reinvent the character and improve upon the character. Blade was successful, even though most audiences didn’t know Blade, and frankly he was basically a C-list character who only appeared in a few episodes of the 90’s Spider-Man character before Wesley Snipe started put on the black sunglasses and killing vampires in the role. So I think a Val or Cal film can succeed. It only depends on how it’s executed.
    Last edited by Amadeus Arkham; 02-27-2021 at 07:47 PM.
    "I love mankind...it's people I can't stand!!"

    - Charles Schultz.

  14. #134
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,924

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by skyvolt2000 View Post
    Miles Morales was in a cartoon voiced by Donald Glover

    Miles had at least 5-7 trades in stores. Softcover and hardcover version. I think there was even a library version.

    Miles had anywhere from 2-5 action figures in stores.

    Miles was SEEN on Spider-Man merchandise including kid's valentines, Easter baskets, greeting cards and so on.

    Miles has a NEW YORK TIMES BEST SELLING Novel in stores.

    Miles's costume was already being made into cosplay and Halloween costumes (mainly in Japan)

    Miles was already in the public's eye before that movie was greenlighted.




    The ISSUE is these studios do NOT want to write those CHECKS in the first place. Nor greenlight those movies.

    See SOME studios do NOT have an issue if a movie with a white hero (Green Lantern, Lone Ranger, John Carter or Constantine) being a FLOP.

    Those flops will NOT stop pitches for Aquaman, Shazam, Green Arrow, Superman or whoever is white.

    If it's Steel or Catwoman-they bomb it's we can't do Black Panther or Cap Marvel or Static.

    Steel and Catwoman cost a combine $117 million and made $83 million (82 for Catwoman and 1 million for Steel). $34 million loss (not counting promo and merchandise)

    John Carter costed $250 and made $284. $34 million loss. 2 movies that cost less lost the same amount as one movie with a higher budget.

    Its the folks in charge that tend to be the issue.
    Well, Steel and Catwoman were ****. No getting around that lol.

    John Carter lost far more than that. The problem there was the title. You see a listing for a movie and it says, "John Carter", you think "meh" . If it had been "John Carter: Warlord of Mars" you immediately think "cool. A space fantasy/sci-fi"

  15. #135
    Incredible Member Menacer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    895

    Default

    Frankly it makes no difference if black Superman is Clark Kent or Val Zod or Kal el. Zero

    I mean flash movie has 2 white bruces waynes/batmans meeting... one old one young, Keaton and Affleck.


    Barry from the movies has already met Barry on the tv cw.

    If black Clark meets white Clark it just makes for a trippy Multiverse experience.

    He can be Val, or Kal. Zero difference as long as we got a great story.

    Black, chinese, indian, white whatever

    The multiverse has always explained it all

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •