Page 9 of 23 FirstFirst ... 567891011121319 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 135 of 331
  1. #121
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Posts
    11,186

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncanny X-Man View Post
    That's the beauty of Wanda and Pietro. As per Marvel's and Fox's old movie licensing contracts, they were the only characters who were equally X-Men and Avengers characters. Think how extraordinary that was that 2 separate companies could both make movies with the same 2 characters, with all the necessary differences obviously. Marvel then went out of their way to distance them from the mutant world in the comics, and then I feel WandaVision has put the final nail on the coffin on them being mutants and Magneto's children again - however Wanda is still very much a player in the X-books (see Empyre), not to mention mutantkind's greatest enemy as per HOX/POX's data pages. For these reasons I feel she deserves to also be considered an X-character and be discussed on this section of the forums.
    Oh, I've heard some SW fans, at least online, feel like her X-Men connection is a detriment to her, due to HoM and No More Mutants

  2. #122
    Chaos bringer GenericUsername's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,044

    Default

    It is a detriment to Wanda. It is not for Pietro. Being a mutant was only a fact about Wanda and barely used in stories. It's had zero impact on her in the six years she's been separate from it.
    Love is for souls, not bodies.

  3. #123
    Chaos bringer GenericUsername's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,044

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncanny X-Man View Post
    That's the beauty of Wanda and Pietro. As per Marvel's and Fox's old movie licensing contracts, they were the only characters who were equally X-Men and Avengers characters. Think how extraordinary that was that 2 separate companies could both make movies with the same 2 characters, with all the necessary differences obviously. Marvel then went out of their way to distance them from the mutant world in the comics, and then I feel WandaVision has put the final nail on the coffin on them being mutants and Magneto's children again - however Wanda is still very much a player in the X-books (see Empyre), not to mention mutantkind's greatest enemy as per HOX/POX's data pages. For these reasons I feel she deserves to also be considered an X-character and be discussed on this section of the forums.
    She appeared in one issue of Empyre which handled her lore on artifacts very terribly and had Doctor Strange treat her as a magic novice when she's been studying magic since the 70s. She's better off not being in those books.
    Love is for souls, not bodies.

  4. #124
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    3,699

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mik View Post
    Didn't he also make her an Avenger?
    Considering he is Satan as far as Marvel’s cosmology in concerned, blame Stan?

    Maybe she can be part of some X-Men/Avengers co-group in the MCU
    I can see them adapting the basic idea of UA as a cartoon some day (when Marvels animation improves) but it would take too long for the MCU

  5. #125
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Posts
    11,186

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by king of hybrids View Post
    Considering he is Satan as far as Marvel’s cosmology in concerned, blame Stan?
    Haha, not sure what you're saying

    Quote Originally Posted by king of hybrids View Post
    I can see them adapting the basic idea of UA as a cartoon some day (when Marvels animation improves) but it would take too long for the MCU
    maybe a loosely inspired version of the team to show solidarity between Avengers and X-Men

  6. #126
    Extraordinary Member BroHomo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Da Souf
    Posts
    6,743

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Journey View Post
    Now that being said pretender is Dumb Wanda is a "Sham!!" Pietro = Pretender Wanda = Sham!
    Uhhh do you know what Sham means?
    :a trick that deludes : HOAX
    : cheap falseness : HYPOCRISY
    : an ornamental covering for a pillow
    an imitation or counterfeit purporting to be genuine
    : a person who shams
    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sham
    On 2nd thought you might be right...
    Quote Originally Posted by Mik View Post
    I don't think that's the definition. Knowing is part of pretending
    Nope! Not necessarily
    Pretender definition...
    : one who lays claim to something
    : one who makes a false or hypocritical show
    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pretender

    Quote Originally Posted by Mik View Post
    As for No More Mutants, Wanda should be held accountable. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of acting like Magneto's good, when he's far more evil. Plus, the X-Men men persecution business is stale after so long
    But um You brought Magneto up! What Trumps Genocide? Maybe to some but the persecution Mutants face is the more realistic aspect of the 616
    Quote Originally Posted by rcaguy View Post
    Simple. They can't defend their argument.Wanda would be no more welcome on Krakoa than the Plauge was in Europe There are just too many who want to see her head mounted on a pike.

    Before anyone says anything:

    Mags had reasons for his actions.

    Wanda is just a Loon.
    Trurer posts there are none lol
    Quote Originally Posted by GenericUsername View Post
    Wanda in comics was possessed at the time. Loon really isn't a great way of describing people with mental illness. But she did not depower mutants because of that. Her depression could have made her seek out the Life Force to begin with though.
    The poster didn't do that he described a fictional character as a Loon. People act like criticizing Wanda's convenient 'mental illness' is equal to pooping directly in their eyes. Despite the fact she suffered this 'mental illness' retroactively and apparently is cured
    GrindrStone(D)

  7. #127
    Chaos bringer GenericUsername's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,044

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BroHomo View Post
    Uhhh do you know what Sham means?
    :a trick that deludes : HOAX
    : cheap falseness : HYPOCRISY
    : an ornamental covering for a pillow
    an imitation or counterfeit purporting to be genuine
    : a person who shams
    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sham
    On 2nd thought you might be right...

    Nope! Not necessarily
    Pretender definition...
    : one who lays claim to something
    : one who makes a false or hypocritical show
    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pretender


    But um You brought Magneto up! What Trumps Genocide? Maybe to some but the persecution Mutants face is the more realistic aspect of the 616

    Trurer posts there are none lol
    The poster didn't do that he described a fictional character as a Loon. People act like criticizing Wanda's convenient 'mental illness' is equal to pooping directly in their eyes. Despite the fact she suffered this 'mental illness' retroactively and apparently is cured
    Loon is a derogatory term for someone with a mental illness. It's not pooping in anyone's eyes. It's treating something very real that real life people have in a flippant and insulting way. It's childish and garbage.
    Love is for souls, not bodies.

  8. #128
    Extraordinary Member BroHomo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Da Souf
    Posts
    6,743

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GenericUsername View Post
    Loon is a derogatory term for someone with a mental illness. It's not pooping in anyone's eyes. It's treating something very real that real life people have in a flippant and insulting way. It's childish and garbage.
    Ehhhh The Pretender almost Genocide-d a group of people calling her a Loon (also a term for an incredibly foolish person) ain't the harshest word that can be used to describe her.
    GrindrStone(D)

  9. #129
    Chaos bringer GenericUsername's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,044

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BroHomo View Post
    Ehhhh The Pretender almost Genocide-d a group of people calling her a Loon (also a term for an incredibly foolish person) ain't the harshest word that can be used to describe her.
    The problem isn't what you consider a fictional character in a fictional story. But how that term treats a very real disorder that affects really real people.
    Love is for souls, not bodies.

  10. #130
    Extraordinary Member BroHomo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Da Souf
    Posts
    6,743

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GenericUsername View Post
    The problem isn't what you consider a fictional character in a fictional story. But how that term treats a very real disorder that affects really real people.
    Ohhh ok I gotcha
    GrindrStone(D)

  11. #131
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    274

    Default

    The X-Men fandoms treatment of Wanda is always very enlightening, in that they'll crucify a character who's wrongdoings were done during a mental breakdown where she wasn't in control of her actions, but they'll jump over every hurdle to tell you how great people like Apocalypse and Magneto are, who have both deliberately committed atrocities in their right mind for years with zero guilt
    Or when it comes to characters like Cyclops and his actions in recent years they'll excuse everything he did as bad writing that doesn't fit the character and thus should be ignored but won't extend the same courtesy to Wanda despite that being very much true for her if not more so.
    It's all very blatant hypocrisy.

  12. #132
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Posts
    11,186

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jewel Runner View Post
    The X-Men fandoms treatment of Wanda is always very enlightening, in that they'll crucify a character who's wrongdoings were done during a mental breakdown where she wasn't in control of her actions, but they'll jump over every hurdle to tell you how great people like Apocalypse and Magneto are, who have both deliberately committed atrocities in their right mind for years with zero guilt
    Or when it comes to characters like Cyclops and his actions in recent years they'll excuse everything he did as bad writing that doesn't fit the character and thus should be ignored but won't extend the same courtesy to Wanda despite that being very much true for her if not more so.
    It's all very blatant hypocrisy.
    It's hard to disagree

  13. #133
    Astonishing Member Zelena's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    4,575

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jewel Runner View Post
    The X-Men fandoms treatment of Wanda is always very enlightening, in that they'll crucify a character who's wrongdoings were done during a mental breakdown where she wasn't in control of her actions, but they'll jump over every hurdle to tell you how great people like Apocalypse and Magneto are, who have both deliberately committed atrocities in their right mind for years with zero guilt
    Or when it comes to characters like Cyclops and his actions in recent years they'll excuse everything he did as bad writing that doesn't fit the character and thus should be ignored but won't extend the same courtesy to Wanda despite that being very much true for her if not more so.
    It's all very blatant hypocrisy.
    Indeed. The question is why.

    Apocalypse and Magneto are considered now as a part of the X-men like Cyclops. There’s rationality: they are just fictive characters whose bad actions can be excused and be attribuable to the authors. They belong to the readers.

    Wanda is a outsider, an outlet for feelings. Apparently it gives her more reality…
    “Strength is the lot of but a few privileged men; but austere perseverance, harsh and continuous, may be employed by the smallest of us and rarely fails of its purpose, for its silent power grows irresistibly greater with time.” Goethe

  14. #134
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    4,026

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jewel Runner View Post
    The X-Men fandoms treatment of Wanda is always very enlightening, in that they'll crucify a character who's wrongdoings were done during a mental breakdown where she wasn't in control of her actions, but they'll jump over every hurdle to tell you how great people like Apocalypse and Magneto are, who have both deliberately committed atrocities in their right mind for years with zero guilt
    Or when it comes to characters like Cyclops and his actions in recent years they'll excuse everything he did as bad writing that doesn't fit the character and thus should be ignored but won't extend the same courtesy to Wanda despite that being very much true for her if not more so.
    It's all very blatant hypocrisy.
    wana was already forgiven with a shitty retcon in her home franchise, we hate wanda because she's a prime mutant antagonist in sheeps clothing.
    She's our joffrey, a horrid villain that STILL NEEDS to get some reckoning, some defeat, some pie in her face, some sweet deserts.

    Magneto and Apocalypse at the very least have many a panel being dragged trough the floor for said villainous actions, once wnady gets her turn ill be satisfied
    Last edited by Ferro; 03-13-2021 at 01:13 AM.

  15. #135
    Extraordinary Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    5,812

    Default

    Yeah, guess again why Wanda fans don't want her in X-franchise?
    Just my hot take, Wanda functionally worked for free for X-franchise's "mutant extinction narrative", like she literally gets zero benefit and compensation out of it.
    And then X-franchise still loves to milk that hate boner for profit, I think reasonable X-fans will just keep it to themselves and focus on what they like for X-Men franchise, and let Wanda be on her own without the baggage of X-franchise.

    Magneto and Apocalypse have their moments of "redemption" because they are bloody X-characters, Wanda got a pass in A-franchise because she is an Avengers character. Really simple.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •