Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 2345678 LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 112
  1. #76
    Moderator Frontier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    116,078

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nite-Wing View Post
    No but what I'm saying is that characters like Ivy and Swamp Thing are not really doing anything evil

    They are simply acting out the will of nature. They have their own sentience but the planet and the environment have a greater voice that needs to be respected
    The hurricane or a flood would be natural disasters that human's can ignore. To avoid Ivy's ire would be to have better environmental practices and maybe not destroy the planet
    Their intentions aren't evil, but that doesn't mean their methods for getting justice for Mother Earth are right or the best methods of going about what they're doing. Which is where we dip into evil (and this is mostly Ivy we're talking about here, Swampy can usually restrain himself better).

  2. #77
    Ultimate Member Gaius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Occupied Klendathu
    Posts
    13,011

    Default

    You know this thread has really highlighted what a poor character Ivy is to be in the stand-in/voice for environmentalism in comics.

    No wonder she and Harley are perfect fits for one another. Both think feeling sorry for themselves makes up for having body counts higher than war criminals, match made in Gotham.
    Last edited by Gaius; 03-16-2021 at 04:38 PM.

  3. #78
    Astonishing Member OopsIdiditagain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    2,021

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by marhawkman View Post
    Yeah when you don't have the power to demolish entire cities with your powers it take a while to rack up a body count. Ivy... Ivy's powers can rack up body counts FAST when she's trying. Cheshire doesn't have that kind of power.
    You don't need to be a plant-powered supervillainess to demolish cities when bombs exist. But even if Cheshire didn't have access to that, she's one of DC's best toxicologists. She could poison an entire city's water supply. But those are terrorist acts, and unlike Poison Ivy, Cheshire Cat is not a genocidal terrorist.
    december 21st has passed where are my superpowers?

  4. #79
    Astonishing Member OopsIdiditagain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    2,021

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nite-Wing View Post
    If a Hurricane demolishes an entire city who is at fault the hurricane or the people who chose to stay in their homes and ride it out?
    Ivy is basically a force of nature, She isn't a petty assassin like Cheshire
    At least when a character's a petty assassin people acknowledge their actions are bad. With Poison Ivy we have people justifying mass murder because it's done with a noble cause.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaius View Post
    You know this thread has really highlighted what a truly terrible character Ivy is to be in the stand-in/voice for environmentalism in comics.

    No wonder she and Harley are perfect fits for one another. Both think feeling sorry for themselves makes up for having body counts higher than war criminals, match made in Gotham.
    I wonder how Poison Ivy would do at the Hague.
    december 21st has passed where are my superpowers?

  5. #80
    Ultimate Member marhawkman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    11,136

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OopsIdiditagain View Post
    You don't need to be a plant-powered supervillainess to demolish cities when bombs exist. But even if Cheshire didn't have access to that, she's one of DC's best toxicologists. She could poison an entire city's water supply. But those are terrorist acts, and unlike Poison Ivy, Cheshire Cat is not a genocidal terrorist.
    You mean Jade Nguyen? https://dc.fandom.com/wiki/Cheshire
    Genociadal? no.... She prefers to choose targets VERY carefully. Well she's an assassin, it's literally her job.

  6. #81
    Moderator Frontier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    116,078

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaius View Post
    You know this thread has really highlighted what a poor character Ivy is to be in the stand-in/voice for environmentalism in comics.

    No wonder she and Harley are perfect fits for one another. Both think feeling sorry for themselves makes up for having body counts higher than war criminals, match made in Gotham.
    To be honest I don't think Ivy and Harley naturally feel sorry for themselves. That's more outside perspective regarding them than anything else. They're pretty unrepentant about the stuff they do and how it effects people.

  7. #82
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    34,097

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nite-Wing View Post
    No but what I'm saying is that characters like Ivy and Swamp Thing are not really doing anything evil

    They are simply acting out the will of nature. They have their own sentience but the planet and the environment have a greater voice that needs to be respected
    The hurricane or a flood would be natural disasters that human's can ignore. To avoid Ivy's ire would be to have better environmental practices and maybe not destroy the planet
    Swamp Thing is nothing like Poison Ivy. For one thing, he has never attempted genocide.

    Ivy claims to be acting out the will of nature. Swamp Thing actually has been selected to defend the environment. And surprise, his methods are very different from Ivy's.

  8. #83
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    672

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nite-Wing View Post
    Ivy in contrast has been forced to become a plant human hybrid and basically hear the planet dying all the time. Instead of letting this continue all the time in a system that keeps the status quo like Batman she has done things to level the playing field.
    Originally Ivy was not a character that could feel the earth. It was later on that they made her a character that can feel the pain of the plants in her surroundings. It makes her a more sympathetic chararcter but if your go to reaction to people who harm plants is to murder them then your morality is not that of a good guy.

    In real life, if you kill someone for destroying your plant pod, i dont think it would be good enough reason.
    Last edited by prepmaster; 03-21-2021 at 03:32 AM.

  9. #84

    Default

    At this point, it just might be best to shift Ivy into full anti-hero category and use Jason Woodrue if you want a villainous eco-terrorist character.

  10. #85
    Ultimate Member marhawkman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    11,136

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Venus View Post
    At this point, it just might be best to shift Ivy into full anti-hero category and use Jason Woodrue if you want a villainous eco-terrorist character.
    Well how do you even define eco-terrorist anyways?

  11. #86
    Extraordinary Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    9,441

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Venus View Post
    At this point, it just might be best to shift Ivy into full anti-hero category and use Jason Woodrue if you want a villainous eco-terrorist character.
    That changes Ivy completely
    She is not a villain anymore she is just Harley girlfriend which all we have seen her be for the last 4 years. No happy ending can occur if they are bad guys.

  12. #87
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    672

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rac7d* View Post
    No happy ending can occur if they are bad guys.
    Its fiction. Didnt DC publish a comics where Harley and Ivy live together happily until one of them dies of old age?

    Anyway the problem is that some writers want to humanize a character like Ivy but do not understand the character enough to make her humane aspects compelling. The relationship between Harley and Ivy is too perfect for the two people who are more violent than normal humans. The writers make the characters too much like them or their fans instead of retaining the characters for who they are.

    I also find it strange that DC chooses two characters with villainous backgrounds to be like their flagship LGBT couple. I guess its just based on popularity of a ship.
    Last edited by prepmaster; 03-21-2021 at 10:49 AM.

  13. #88
    Extraordinary Member kjn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    4,875

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by prepmaster View Post
    I also find it strange that DC chooses two characters with villainous backgrounds to be like their flagship LGBT couple. I guess its just based on popularity of a ship.
    I'm pretty sure that DC never made that choice, and that if they had made one they'd have chosen a different couple. But they never made one, indeed some within DC's editorial structure were apparently dead set against any such choice, so the fen did the choice for them.

    I can't say the fen were wrong in doing so.
    «Speaking generally, it is because of the desire of the tragic poets for the marvellous that so varied and inconsistent an account of Medea has been given out» (Diodorus Siculus, The Library of History [4.56.1])

  14. #89
    Astonishing Member Nite-Wing's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    3,175

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Agent Z View Post
    Swamp Thing is nothing like Poison Ivy. For one thing, he has never attempted genocide.

    Ivy claims to be acting out the will of nature. Swamp Thing actually has been selected to defend the environment. And surprise, his methods are very different from Ivy's.
    They have both been selected/acknowledged based on their methods
    They prioritize the marginalization of plants and nature who has no one advocating for them on the planet compared to humanity

    The days of the evil interpretation towards Ivy's methods are done. Even Swamp Thing has basically been turned more aggressive and won't be out of place smacking batman around or another hero if they get in his way
    The difference between them is minute nowadays
    The types of stories where Ivy is seducing men to gain money/influence so that she can be worshipped/rich/create paradise etc are becoming fewer and fewer

  15. #90
    Fantastic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    401

    Default

    image.jpgimage.jpgimage.jpg

    Her being a villain is a matter of personal opinion. However, her being a serial killer isn't.

    Source: Detective Comics 823, November 2006

    As an aside, Harvest is a fantastic element to bring into Queen Ivy. They won't of course, as DC's policy about unredeemable female villains is that they must be characters of color and Harvest is comprised of white people. But a creation of the Green and Ivy's victims that loathes Ivy? Great story element. It's a shame Bruce dumped weed killer on it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •