Page 74 of 95 FirstFirst ... 246470717273747576777884 ... LastLast
Results 1,096 to 1,110 of 1417
  1. #1096
    Mighty Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    1,382

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kevinism View Post
    Please, PLEASE stop repeating this. I am gay and I hate that word. Nobody I know likes that word. It may be preferred with the people you know, but not THE WHOLE COMMUNITY.
    When did the word queer which means strange became another word for homosexual?

    and another thing ........When did the word gay which means joyous became another word for homosexual?
    I created a thread about Dick Grayson/Nightwing and Koriand'r/Starfire. It is to acknowledge and honor their iconic and popular relationship.

    I created a fan page about Peter Parker/Spider-Man and Mary Jane Watson. This page is for all the Spider-Marriage fans.

  2. #1097
    Mighty Member Brian B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,789

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kevinism View Post
    Please, PLEASE stop repeating this. I am gay and I hate that word. Nobody I know likes that word. It may be preferred with the people you know, but not THE WHOLE COMMUNITY.
    What would your preferred term be for a throuple? Let me know, please. I am seriously NOT trying to offend the LGBTQ+ community. I will use whatever term you want me ro use.

  3. #1098
    The King Fears NO ONE! Triniking1234's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    10,950

    Default

    I don't want to pick sides but unless something happens on page or a creator says something like they did with Speed, Scott and Logan being bi is still in the speculation category.

    We already went through this with Logan after that Nightcrawler cover.
    "Cable was right!"

  4. #1099
    Incredible Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    540

    Default

    If either, or both of, Cyclops and Wolverine are gay or bisexual does it matter? I mean are people actually offended by the perceived sexuality of fictional characters? If you are then the problem is yours, not the writer, not other fans, not the characters. It surely isn't a massive stretch to believe that a character doesn't fully acknowledge their complete sexuality until a little later in life. I'm pretty sure most of us (at least those my age) know someone that's happened to.

    Does it make a difference to whether they can fight? Or save the world? Or interact with their teams? Does it mean there are fewer story options going forward?

    I don't think so, I'm reading the books, it might not have been something I'd have suggested, but all it's done is make me raise an eyebrow. It hasn't ruined my enjoyment of the books.

    Maybe just relax about it and enjoy the stories.

  5. #1100
    Extraordinary Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    5,512

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Starrius View Post
    When did the word queer which means strange became another word for homosexual?

    and another thing ........When did the word gay which means joyous became another word for homosexual?
    http://www.todayifoundout.com/index....an-homosexual/

  6. #1101
    Incredible Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    609

    Default

    I have not read a lot about fans objecting to any character’s sexuality…it’s mostly the overall characterization. Wolverine was long established as an alpha male loner…I can’t imagine him sharing his partner…that infers equality. Scott has always been portrayed as arrow straight and rigid ( that’s straight as in bound by codes, and inflexible, not in its sexual orientation meaning) . Being sexually adventurous seems so out of character for him…unless it’s all part of the re birth process messing with people…

  7. #1102
    The King Fears NO ONE! Triniking1234's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    10,950

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Big Joe View Post
    If either, or both of, Cyclops and Wolverine are gay or bisexual does it matter? I mean are people actually offended by the perceived sexuality of fictional characters? If you are then the problem is yours, not the writer, not other fans, not the characters. It surely isn't a massive stretch to believe that a character doesn't fully acknowledge their complete sexuality until a little later in life. I'm pretty sure most of us (at least those my age) know someone that's happened to.

    Does it make a difference to whether they can fight? Or save the world? Or interact with their teams? Does it mean there are fewer story options going forward?

    I don't think so, I'm reading the books, it might not have been something I'd have suggested, but all it's done is make me raise an eyebrow. It hasn't ruined my enjoyment of the books.

    Maybe just relax about it and enjoy the stories.
    I mean if the source of the "offense" is the story, then the writer has some blame.

    Also I don't think anyone's offended, it's just a speculation debate.
    "Cable was right!"

  8. #1103
    BANNED Rang10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    2,906

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Triniking1234 View Post
    I don't want to pick sides but unless something happens on page or a creator says something like they did with Speed, Scott and Logan being bi is still in the speculation category.

    We already went through this with Logan after that Nightcrawler cover.
    More of the old same again.

    People just love to bully their way into canon, but that is not how canon works

  9. #1104
    Astonishing Member Kingdom X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Posts
    4,597

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rang10 View Post
    More of the old same again.

    People just love to bully their way into canon, but that is not how canon works
    I agree that bi Scott and Logan isn't canon, because future writers can just say that they're living together because of Jean.

    Still didn't you just call out the writers for queerbaiting? I can't really get mad at fans who latch onto the hints that the writers purposefully dangle in front of them, let alone call them bullies.

  10. #1105
    BANNED Rang10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    2,906

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingdom X View Post
    I agree that bi Scott and Logan isn't canon, because future writers can just say that they're living together because of Jean.

    Still didn't you just call out the writers for queerbaiting? I can't really get mad at fans who latch onto the hints that the writers purposefully dangle in front of them, let alone call them bullies.
    They havee been living on mansion for years. It i snot the big deal that people want to make

    Hints? they just interpret on the way that they want without any proof. It is pure queerbaiting and I wont be played by it

  11. #1106
    Mighty Member Brian B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,789

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rang10 View Post
    More of the old same again.

    People just love to bully their way into canon, but that is not how canon works
    Except we know that Scott+Jean+Logan is happening. That IS a thing depicted in the comics.

    We may not know that Scott and Logan are a thing or rather the primary thing. That is speculation. We only know Scott and Logan are happening within the context of the Scott+Jean+Logan throuple.

    And it is NOT bullying to discuss what the comics are showing.

    If you want to blame someone, then blame Hickman, not fellow readers like me or others.
    Last edited by Brian B; 05-06-2021 at 09:26 AM.

  12. #1107
    BANNED Rang10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    2,906

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian B View Post
    Except we know that Scott+Jean+Logan is happening. That IS a thing depicted in the comics.

    We may not know that Scott and Logan are a thing or rather the primary thing. That is speculation. We only know Scott and Logan are happening within the context of the Scott+Jean+Logan throuple.

    And it is NOT bullying to discuss what the comics are showing.

    If you want to blame someone, then blame Hickman, not fellow readers like me or others.
    we know that jean kissed Logan, and nothing more. Scott knows about it? nobody knows. people can speculate whatever but that doesn't no make canon. Wanting it o make anon and pressing people for it, for me is bullying. you dont have any proof

    it is bery stanlished that Scott and Logan arent lovers or LGBT. We saw every thought they have for decades.

  13. #1108
    Mighty Member Brian B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,789

    Default

    I don’t think anyone should be offended by the depiction of Scott+Jean+Logan. I do think people need to relax about these topics, don’t be so uptight about it.

    However, I was raised in a very traditional and by today’s standards a religiously conservative environment—religion, NOT politics, which believe it or not used to be a separate thing—and I am still a believer. I can understand why people are not fans of depictions of alternative lifestyles in fiction if it involves more than a couple.

    I fully support LGBQT+ people and their rights, including rights to marry, to health care through partner benefits, to have children, to adopt children, to any tax benefits, and much more — to live freely in the pursuit of happiness, like everyone.

    I fully support people in polyamorous relationships and their rights as well, though I’m not exactly sure how adoption would work for more than two people.

    I do not believe in excluding from society people who have done nothing wrong to society. I believe in the rights of people to live freely.

    But more than a couple people isn’t something that I necessarily see as automatically equivalent to a couple. I can understand how an audience maybe upset at the depiction of sexual relationships involving more than two people depicted. It does go on in real life. It’s something that happens. Depicting it in fiction ought to not be off limits. I don’t think people who live in that lifestyle ought to be personally or politically persecuted over it, either. That would be wrong. It is a fine line, though.

    Polygamy is often ripe for the abuse of people, especially children. I would imagine polyandry can involve some of the same dynamics. I’m not saying people should in any way be prevented from engaging in or depicting polyamory. But I think we as a country of laws and rights need to be educated and smart about this.

    All that said, what Hickman has really done is pick up the ball Chris Claremont set up on the field hundreds and hundreds if not thousands of issues ago, and Hickman’s run with it. That’s all that’s happening between Scott+Jean+Logan.

    We need a name for this throuple, like Benifer has a name. (Are Ben and JLo really back? )

    What about “Scloannie?” “Cyphine?” “Lottie?”

    At least the Hickman run is not boring.

  14. #1109
    Mighty Member Krakoa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    1,873

    Default

    Honestly feel like what's going on with Kitty Pryde is more queerbaiting than the throuple situation. One-off panel of her kissing a woman seeming to confirm her as bi, no follow up and she's not featured on any of the materials for Marvel's Voices: Pride.

  15. #1110
    Mighty Member Brian B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,789

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rang10 View Post
    we know that jean kissed Logan, and nothing more. Scott knows about it? nobody knows. people can speculate whatever but that doesn't no make canon. Wanting it o make anon and pressing people for it, for me is bullying. you dont have any proof

    it is bery stanlished that Scott and Logan arent lovers or LGBT. We saw every thought they have for decades.
    So, you’re calling Jeannie a cheater then? Hogwash.

    Dude, the three of them live in a suite of three rooms without any doors, together. Hickman has confirmed in interviews that they ARE, the three of them, living together in a sexual relationship. AND, NO ONE just makes out naked in a hot tub alone.

    People may sit together naked and platonically in a hot tub. But two people, alone and naked in a hot tub, making out do NOT stop with kissing.

    Last, your definition of bullying is garbage.

    You have made perfectly clear that you do not agree with what is being depicted in the comics. But don’t try to claim the creators are not clearly showing the throuple. They are. This is the X-Men, NOT porn. Have some taste and maturity, and accept they’re not going to show you a more explicit sex scene then the one they have shown between Logan and Jean. That’s your clear depiction right there, in X-Force.
    Last edited by Brian B; 05-06-2021 at 09:44 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •