Im surprised no one has suggested they use Sabretooth as a test subject to try and understand why his inversion wore off and Alex' did not
Didn't the writer herself said in an interview that she can't get into heros and finds villains much more interesting?
Not to be mean spirited, but if that's true, one could get the impression the editors allowed her to randomly throw in Malice so she can have her villain to explore for the arc, while actualy focusing on the existing plot too.
It's just how this random choice feels. I can neither proof these intention nor remember where the interview was. So i might be entirely wrong.
Except Malice wasn't "explored" not to any great depth, she was just inserted...unnecessarily so.
Lord Ewing *Praise His name! Uplift Him in song!* Your divine works will be remembered and glorified in worship for all eternity. Amen!
That was one surprisingly good read.
Maybe the first Excalibur issue I truly enjoyed?
yaaaas betty rock that choker
I don't blind date I make the direct market vibrate
That’s enough though. Like Empath she’s always been able to get away without the consequences of her actions, which essentially means she’s never had a chance to emotionally develop from the annoying self-absorbed teenager she was when her mutation kicked in. Of course Sinister took advantage of that.
Good also to finally see a mutant from a background similar to mine, though pretty sure no-one in 1970s Doncaster had a staircase that massive in their terrace.