The FMA movie was what I was thinking about when I typed that sentence. It's one of my favorite series and it sucked seeing it bastardize like that.
I would prefer if they just adapt arcs or better yet make their own story. The live action Kenshin films were amazing.
Why? The anime already exists, adaptations won't erase that. But a lot of people want to see those characters brought to life. It doesn't hurt anything, and there's always the chance it'll be good or even great. It's like saying we can just keep the comics and not adapt superheroes - we could, but why?
The Cowboy Bebop adaptation isn't even out and they're giving them Gundam? Oh boy.
"Cable was right!"
Avatar: Here's to the late, great Steve Dillon. Best. Punisher. Artist. EVER!
I think it'll be set at an undisclosed spot in the Universal Century timeline instead of adapting a specific Gundam series.
Most American adaptations are pretty bad. They are more like the Halle Berry Catwoman movie. The Japanese live action movies tend to be better.
Animation allows you to bring more things to life in a different way. There's probably a reason why Kirkman chose to adapt Invincible as a cartoon.
A better way to tackle American adaptations would be to do a new story/spinoff set in the same world. Similar to how Watchmen was adapted by HBO. The video is a rewrite for the Death Note American movie setting it as a spinoff in the States.
Gundam has many different series but the throughline is an exploration of war and its horrors. So crafting a new story with that in mind feels like the easiest option.
It's not a matter of it being valid, or what any of us think is a more "true-to-source" medium. It about the fact that a bunch of people like seeing these characters brought in live action and are willing to pay to see that. And honestly, as one of those people, what's so wrong with that?
So? Comic book movies used to be bad. American adaptations of those got better. Video game adaptations are improving, Same can happen for manga/anime adaptations.
So? No one is saying animation is bad, or that animation can't be great. On;y that it's not the same thing as live action, that live action adaptations has a special appeal for a lot of people. There is a demand for it, there's an audience for it, and there's profit to be made off of it. So - why not?Animation allows you to bring more things to life in a different way. There's probably a reason why Kirkman chose to adapt Invincible as a cartoon.
There's nothing wrong with spin-offs, but people don't want to be limited to only spin offs. What's wrong with straight adaptations?A better way to tackle American adaptations would be to do a new story/spinoff set in the same world. Similar to how Watchmen was adapted by HBO. The video is a rewrite for the Death Note American movie setting it as a spinoff in the States.
Maybe, but would that satisfy some fans?Gundam has many different series but the throughline is an exploration of war and its horrors. So crafting a new story with that in mind feels like the easiest option.
Again, is there anything inherently wrong or awful about them making a straight live action adaptation?
I'm just explaining why other fans wouldn't like the idea of live action adaptations.
There is nothing wrong with straight adaptations. Hollywood has a bad track record so I rather give them more options. If doing a new story would get me a better movie....it's worth it.
It could satisfy a lot of fans. It's a risk worth taking.
And they can simply choose to not watch it. No one's forcing them to go see live action adaptations. So why's it a problem that a lot of people do want to see it done?
But sometimes sticking to a straight adaptation does get you a better movie. So why isn't that also a risk worth taking?There is nothing wrong with straight adaptations. Hollywood has a bad track record so I rather give them more options. If doing a new story would get me a better movie....it's worth it.
It could satisfy a lot of fans. It's a risk worth taking.