Results 1 to 15 of 42

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    The Revan.....lives! Oswin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    994

    Default Stark tech (mcu) vs Wakanda Tech (mcu)

    That's right.


    Which would you say is more high tech?



    You inherit all of stark's gadgets vs All of shuri's, what do you pick?

  2. #2
    Writer and editor KJS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    The U.K.
    Posts
    1,953

    Default

    All things considered, it's got to be Wakanda.

    A country-wide forcefield, vibranium on tap, mass-produced energy shields, energy weapons, impenetrable (yet comfortable/flexible) armour.

    Stark's armours ARE more impressive than the Black Panther armours, in terms of fancy abilities, but they're much more breakable - and I'd argue that Wakandan tech in general can do everything Stark's armours can do AND MORE (flight, nanotech, stealth stuff, energy weapons etc) - it's just that all the fancy stuff isn't put into the classic Black Panther armour.

    I'd much prefer to have access to the wider array of tech which also happens to be made from the strongest material available.

  3. #3
    She/Her Cthulhu_of_R'lyeh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    21,472

    Default

    I want to say Tony's better on the individual level?

    A suit that can draw blood from Thanos is far more impressive than anything Wakanda showed, but Wakanda has the capability to produce more tech that's in the ballpark of Tony's stuff.

    So... one if the rare cases of quantity over quality?
    Yeah, but if you... man, we're getting into weird analogy territory, like if you disintegrated Superman's arms he wouldn't be able to go "fool! Little did you know that my arms and I are one and can be remade from me!" and will his arms back into being from pure nothingness. - Pendaran

    Arx Inosaan

  4. #4
    The Revan.....lives! Oswin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    994

    Default

    Yea you both make good points, wakanda has more abundancy and variation it seems, but they havent shown something that could match a thanos wielding a couple of infinity gems, albeit for a short while. although the latest tony armor isnt unbreakable, it did manage to make him survive a good chunk of a moon falling on him.

  5. #5
    JUST DO IT?!?! Postmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    3,404

    Default

    I'd say forcefield + vibraniun would survive the moon
    “The master has failed more times than the beginner has even tried.”
    -Stephen McCranie

  6. #6
    She/Her Cthulhu_of_R'lyeh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    21,472

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Postmania View Post
    I'd say forcefield + vibraniun would survive the moon
    I really don't see this comparison holding up. Thanos one-shot KO'd the Black Panther, while also overloading his suit and forcing a kinetic discharge. The shields were also being penetrated/were going to be overwhelmed by the Outriders. Iron Man made Thanos bleed with his latest/last armor variant, and Thanos actually had to exert himself however slightly. The main, and really only difference, and why I feel Wakanda my edge this is purely down to the amount of output Wakanda has over Tony.
    Yeah, but if you... man, we're getting into weird analogy territory, like if you disintegrated Superman's arms he wouldn't be able to go "fool! Little did you know that my arms and I are one and can be remade from me!" and will his arms back into being from pure nothingness. - Pendaran

    Arx Inosaan

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •