To clarify are you advocating for the use of available minority character over race-swapping or vice versa?
Regardless I'll state my opinion on that. I would rather an MCU project pull from any number of X-Men teams to get a character from a certain demographic than race-swap. It's not that I think that race-swapping is inherently wrong, but it's honestly really tiring to hear people go on and on about how their favorite character has been "ruined" because of a race change (when race wasn't a factor in that character's story).
Then make a story about that not about the x-gene as a metaphor for dozens of things.
And you think that in this day and age people accept those kind of simplistic mutant metaphors for racism better than they would if you were actually using african Americans?
How does being Goth make you understand affirmative action? How does being arabic or black make you accelt gay adoption? Education and exposure define your values not the "experience of being in a minority". And do you not see how insulting and annoying it is to ignore the actual important parts of these experiences for a vague and useless metaphor for " We are all unpriviliege so we should agree on all social issues". The mutant metaphor isn't just useless, it's laughable in the world of today because it tries to say something important but none of the examples it gives make sense.
Does it need doing?
Yes.
Then it will be done.
I don't agree with that take either. I don't think the metaphor has gone nearly far enough, likely because most of the X-Men's writers have been straight white males. My point is that there are more than enough properties in comic bookdom who can provide straight white male escapist fantasy without messy "political" themes, if that's your bag. The X-Men is not one of them, and it shouldn't be.
Well, to Kingdom X's point about F&WS (which admittedly I haven't watched) when I say PSA I mean the checking the boxes thing and drawing a reader/viewer out of a story with a heavy-handed approach to the topic. That's why a metaphor is better than just stating things or being so blunt about it.
It's not about scaring audiences away, it's about audiences gravitating to stories that include the message without being preachy or heavy-handed.
Does it need doing?
Yes.
Then it will be done.
Do people here not realize that there's a big difference between writing an X-men story that shows the black or gay experience, and writing a story that has black or gay people talk about how they are discriminated but claming that the X-gene is the reason why? Adressing real issues is great, using a dumb mutant metaphor is awful.
But I welcome anyone that wants to describe to me how they would use the mutabt metaphor in this day and age. Describe that scene to me.
Arguably, the benefit of a widely diverse cast such as the X-Men means they actually could show how different every group's and individual's experiences with bigotry. It doesn't have to be an in-depth PSA or NatGeo special like some people act like it would, but it can be more comprehensive than a surface-level "racism is bad" idea
Lack of diversity behind the scenes has been a problem in the industry. Idk if it's improving. But even White male writers could research how to make more accurate female, PoC, and other minority characters. It's not impossible
But most of these stories aren't that heavy-handed, at least not from what i've seen. This slippery slope argument always comes up but just ends up stalling progress without justification. No one's pointing to the camera saying "racism is bad". And frankly X-Men do preach about stuff, but it's just a fictional prejudice instead of the real deal
Exactly. I wouldn't call the metaphor dumb, just outdated
But it's not a standard that disabilities occur at puberty like it is for mutants, that's my point.
Do we need metaphors for the gay experience? No. Is it nice to see that reflect? Yes. Also again, one does not preclude the other, we can have both.
That... is the main the story and the reason why mutants are persecuted. They don't get hated for no reason.Then make a story about that not about the x-gene as a metaphor for dozens of things.
I mean the X-Men are still pretty popular so yes? They've been overtaken by the Avengers because of the resources directed at the franchise in and outside of comics.And you think that in this day and age people accept those kind of simplistic mutant metaphors for racism better than they would if you were actually using african Americans?
I just answered your question, power dynamics and status are highlighted when you are treated as an other. Do they understood the details or intrinsic of everything involved in being a particularly minority or ethnicity? No but there are commonalities found in between those examples because of what I've repeated. Of course the leagues of differences between a goth and a racial minority is that one can choose to stop or change a sense of fashion or lifestyle, so it's not really an equal comparison in that respect.How does being Goth make you understand affirmative action? How does being arabic or black make you accelt gay adoption? Education and exposure define your values not the "experience of being in a minority". And do you not see how insulting and annoying it is to ignore the actual important parts of these experiences for a vague and useless metaphor for " We are all unpriviliege so we should agree on all social issues". The mutant metaphor isn't just useless, it's laughable in the world of today because it tries to say something important but none of the examples it gives make sense.
And no? I'm part of various minorities myself and it never annoyed me to see it represented on-screen or in the comics through the metaphor. I think it's the opposite, I get the impression lots of minorities were attracted by the premise of the X-Men. Would I find it annoying if it was all white-characters or the times the X-Men have been majority white like the X-films? Yes but that's not always the case and is an extreme.
Also unprivileged socioeconomic and racial groups do frequently poll or skew toward certain social policies, this has been researched, so it's kinda funny that was brought up. Not everyone of course, because there are traditionalist and conservative unprivileged as well but there are definitely patterns present in politics and opinions because of shared experiences.
I'm really surprised to find a current X-fan who seems to think the metaphor was completely useless or outdated. I'm curious, what attracted you to the franchise then?
Last edited by ChronoRogue; 05-17-2021 at 01:41 PM.
A couple of thoughts:
1. You're absolutely correct, talking about mutant oppression is not a good replacement for actual minority stories.
2. For me the metaphor doesn't have to go beyond, "Mutants are different, so humans are wary of them, and that's why they spend time together and form superhero teams." That way you have plenty of space to explore actual marginalized identities or a plethora of other stories without getting bogged down by a somewhat outdated metaphor.
3. Question for everyone: Do you need your X-Men stories to address discrimination? I'm not sure if stories about real-life marginalization are going to take center stage even if they de-emphasize the metaphor.
I think it's reasonable, if you can succinctly pair it down to one thing that it's clearly a metaphor for. otherwise, the whole X-men is EVERY minority thing, just rings woefully hollow. Cause it's just not true and does a disservice to all parties.