So now there's a 'Complex' about denying the first 'Complex' ?
What madness!!
So now there's a 'Complex' about denying the first 'Complex' ?
What madness!!
GrindrStone(D)
I was so angry during this period and angry about the Maximoffs. I thought it was stupid that they limited their own cartoons and games by excluding their own most iconic characters. I never stopped to think about one thing: how insane was that original deal they signed in the 90s? “You will have access to every character from this specific origin indefinitely.” There’s no way they could have known that Disney would buy them and they’d have endless cash to burn making their own media but still! That seems like horrible business.
IIRC, Marvel was over a barrel when they sold off the rights to the X-Men, Hulk, Namor, etc. The company was nearing bankruptcy and wasn't in a position to play hardball with regard to movie rights. And, really, the Fox deal worked out quite well for them until the Disney purchase put them in competition with their own IP.
You've been gaslighted by too many click bait articles to the point that you irrationally had to blame something for X-Men Apocalypse, Legion and The Gifted because according to your logic they stopped selling X-Men t-shirts at Target and all those Deadpool and X-Men movies and TV shows never existed.
I mentioned a couple of pages back that I've seen Disney's styleguides from a few years ago and seen first-hand how they were telling their own Sales people not to sell X-Men licences, down to a character by character replacement sheet with the Avengers and Guardians equivalents. So I don't really need to read any articles to convince me. The Inhumans show happened some time later after that and in parallel, it's not connected to the merchandise aspect but it's still part of Marvel's attempt to downplay the X-Men in favour of other characters they fully owned at the time.
Again, this isn't a matter of opinion, it's all been well documented and spoken about by various creators and it's also fully apparent if you have any familiarity with the licensing industry. But hey, believe what you will, I said my piece
The conspiracy theory is that the inhumans were this big thing taking the place of X-Men merchandise, etc. There was practically nothing inhumans anywhere. Did Marvel push Black Panther, Iron Man, Captain Marvel, Thor, etc. Yes. Did they make less X-Men merchandise, most likely because Marvel had to push Black Panther and Ant-Man instead of Kitty and Jean. This had nothing to do with the inhumans, but people acted like shelves were packed with inhumans sh*t when there was a t-shirt and funko pops (that were made of the X-Men too).
So yes, you and many people were gaslighted to believe that you had to direct your hate at something that was not getting much attention because you would've looked ridiculous blaming the Avengers, Spider-Man and the Guardians of the Galaxy, which got a lot more than the inhumans because duh.
I must have missed all the posts talking about the deluge of Inhumans toys etc replacing the X-Men ones then, because I don't really remember anyone ever saying anything about that. The Inhumans were always a non-entity in merchandise, there was never any push on that side and I don't believe anyone here is saying there was, but again, perhaps I've missed a few posts.
I'm not denying that there were less non-Deadpool X-Men products, etc., but the campaign against the inhumans because of it made no sense because they were never put in the same status as the X-Men. That was the Avengers. Because Marvel has a lot of characters and wanted to use them, contrary to DC's obsession with Batman. I think the Avengers push was good because now the X-Men can be featured in their comic book world on screen, and not an isolated property like they usually have been since the 80's-90's.