Results 1 to 14 of 14

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Was Jack Kirby ever considered for a run on Superman?

    Was Jack Kirby ever considered for a run on Superman?

    Just wondering. It could have been cool, concurrent with his New Gods work in the 1970s. Whether "Action Comics" or the "Superman" book (or, yet another?) it could have had lots of bronze age fun for Clark, Lois and the rest of the cast.

  2. #2
    Uncanny Member MajorHoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    29,974

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hypestyle View Post
    Was Jack Kirby ever considered for a run on Superman?

    Just wondering. It could have been cool, concurrent with his New Gods work in the 1970s. Whether "Action Comics" or the "Superman" book (or, yet another?) it could have had lots of bronze age fun for Clark, Lois and the rest of the cast.
    You mean besides his stint on Superman's Pal Jimmy Olsen when he was doing his other Fourth World stuff?

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MajorHoy View Post
    You mean besides his stint on Superman's Pal Jimmy Olsen when he was doing his other Fourth World stuff?
    I was thinking more along the lines of having full access to all the Superman strip characters. Kind of like he came back to Marvel and did Black Panther.. but maybe if he had a six-year run on Superman.. hmm...

  4. #4
    Astonishing Member Johnny Thunders!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    WGBS
    Posts
    2,537

    Default

    I’m not sure but his ideas with the character have sure stuck around. Morgan Edge, The New Gods , Cadmus,,, I prefer his “Superman in Supertown” over “Must there be a Superman.” My guess is that Curt Swan had the art duties locked up. I think it’s one of the great missed opportunities like Steve Gerber on a run. In my version of Luciens Library, there is a huge Kirby run next to the Alan Moore Garcia Lopez volumes of Superman and Action.

  5. #5
    Astonishing Member kingaliencracker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,156

    Default

    Considering DC changed Superman's appearance in the comics Kirby drew him, I'm going to say probably not.

  6. #6
    Invincible Member Vordan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    26,492

    Default

    Don’t think so, especially given how house style obsessed DC was. Can’t see them allowing Kirby to handle their flagship character given how much of a trailblazer he was and how conservative DC was back then.
    For when my rants on the forums just aren’t enough: https://thevindicativevordan.tumblr.com/

  7. #7
    Ultimate Member Robotman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    California
    Posts
    12,150

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kingaliencracker View Post
    Considering DC changed Superman's appearance in the comics Kirby drew him, I'm going to say probably not.
    Erasing Jack Kirby's drawings of Superman. Still one of the greatest affronts in comics history.

    Kirby often did not like to use characters that he didn't have a hand in creating, so I'm not sure he would have been happy being thrown directly into the regular Superman monthly where Supes' supporting cast and villains may have been expected to appear. On the Jimmy Olsen book he could still write a Superman comic but create his own world without feeling pressure to adhere to the general/traditional narrative.

    So having him on the Jimmy Olsen title was kind of a win-win for DC. They get The King to write their flagship character but allow him the freedom to throw out some crazy new ideas.
    Last edited by Robotman; 06-28-2021 at 04:51 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •