Yes
No
Not Sure or It Depends
I feel really bad for Vaughn, who I've always liked, because I'm not really sure he has the range to succeed in projects that aren't comedies. I thought his character in True Detective S2 had the best storyline out of the main cast, but I think an actor with a little more dramatic range could have elevated the role significantly.
MAGNETO was right,TONY was right, VARYS was right.
Proud member of House Ravenclaw and loyal bannerman to House Baratheon
"I am an optimist even though I am told everything I do is negative and cynical" --Armando Iannucci
Never took Tara Reid seriously as an actress, anytime I think of her all I can remember is boobs falling out of dress and the America Pie movies, and that franchise I just found very hard to take seriously even for a teen franchise.
YES, 100% Some actors aren't taken seriously because they don't seem to embrace the craft of acting. They don't seem to grow. They don't seem to seek out challenges. They don't even seem to want to do that... AND THAT'S FINE! I think there has to be a clear distinction between 'what they want' vs 'what others think an actor should do'. If they just want to make silly films, or depthless actions films, badly written horror, etc or simply not try to bring anything but the bare minimum asked even in good films (and get paid millions to do it) power to them. Live your best life. They have every right to do that.
BUT... that won't garner respect. That won't improve their talent. And that's okay, but on the same note: people are allowed to (for want of a better phrase) not value them as an actor... when said actors don't seem to give it much attention either.
"We are Shakespeare. We are Michelangelo. We are Tchaikovsky. We are Turing. We are Mercury. We are Wilde. We are Lincoln, Lorca, Leonardo da Vinci. We are Alexander the Great. We are Fredrick the Great. We are Rustin. We are Addams. We are Marsha! Marsha Marsha Marsha! We so generous, we DeGeneres. We are Ziggy Stardust hooked to the silver screen. Controversially we are Malcolm X. We are Plato. We are Aristotle. We are RuPaul, god dammit! And yes, we are Woolf."
Probably true. Which is their right... but it doesn't garner respect for the craft of acting. Those are two separate issues. If that makes sense?
HEAVILY disagree.
a) you can make a fluff role fantastic, you just have to put in the work and create the complexity if none is given in your character. It's literally your job to do the role to the best of your ability.
b) we're really only talking about movie stars here, and they could easily take a pay cut and do a lower budget film (still getting £100,000 for it) that gives them the opportunity to play varied characters, because the film will not care about type-casting if they have a major star attached to get it media attention.
But do you respect him as a film star or an ACTOR! As a star, he deserves respect because he made it. He's huge and to do that with limited talent is a great achievement. It's like Madonna... she's not where she is today based on singing ability, but more her drive, determination, work ethic and career savvy. But when it comes to acting ability, being a star doesn't mean you are a good actor worth respecting.
"We are Shakespeare. We are Michelangelo. We are Tchaikovsky. We are Turing. We are Mercury. We are Wilde. We are Lincoln, Lorca, Leonardo da Vinci. We are Alexander the Great. We are Fredrick the Great. We are Rustin. We are Addams. We are Marsha! Marsha Marsha Marsha! We so generous, we DeGeneres. We are Ziggy Stardust hooked to the silver screen. Controversially we are Malcolm X. We are Plato. We are Aristotle. We are RuPaul, god dammit! And yes, we are Woolf."
Errrr. no. I really don't think they could. It's not THAT simple; a little coaching and BAM you're brilliant at acting. I'm sure I could become an Eisner award winning comic artist, I'll take a few art classes and be ready to win that accolade, right? Come on, that's pretty dismissive of the craft of acting.
People forget both Peter O'Toole and Paul Newman felt they weren't give the level of kudos for their early work, because many dismissed them as 'just pretty boys'.
I think Hemsworth is very talented. He's easily the most gifted of all the Marvel Chrises. He was very good in "Rush", and in his films is able to deliver comedy, tragedy and knows when to throw away a line. He's a damn good actor.
"We are Shakespeare. We are Michelangelo. We are Tchaikovsky. We are Turing. We are Mercury. We are Wilde. We are Lincoln, Lorca, Leonardo da Vinci. We are Alexander the Great. We are Fredrick the Great. We are Rustin. We are Addams. We are Marsha! Marsha Marsha Marsha! We so generous, we DeGeneres. We are Ziggy Stardust hooked to the silver screen. Controversially we are Malcolm X. We are Plato. We are Aristotle. We are RuPaul, god dammit! And yes, we are Woolf."
When I watch him( and I do enjoy his work) I don't think I've ever really "believed" in what he was doing to the point that I don't think I can really name any of the characters he's played...he's just Vin Diesel in just about everything he's done. Fast and Furious? Fun films...but who's he play? What are his motivations as a character? I don't know, it's Vin Diesel blowing up cars and it's fun. Pitch Black films? Who is he? What does he want? Heck if I know, it's just Vin Diesel in space killing people and its fun to watch.
I think the only two roles where he actually made me care about who he was playing were Iron Giant and Guardians of the Galaxy...and in both films he just provides the voice...and even then really only makes noises. And yet those are the roles where I actually remember the character's names and actually feel like they had actual personalities and lives of their own.
Rock has put in some pretty good performances in movies like Runner and Gain & Pain.
He also has great comedic timing, which some actors don't.
There came a time when the Old Gods died! The Brave died with the Cunning! The Noble perished locked in battle with unleashed Evil! It was the last day for them! An ancient era was passing in fiery holocaust!
Ha, for me it's the opposite. I care the least for GOTG,IG chars. Dom and Riddick are different one is a loner type and the other is all about Family lol. The motivations might not be complicated maybe he's just trying to survive or being forced to pull off a caper. But that's okay too. If the masses who see his movies didn't care they wouldn't be spending money and he wouldn't be successful.
Yeah, but he also seems to religiously protect his brand. He has people counting the punches his character takes, for example. In Hobbs and Shaw, his fight with a cyborg superman was pretty underwhelming because of that, IMO.
Compare that to Chris Evans' Cap, who got his rear beat in two of his own movies.