Wonder Woman 80th Anniversary Special

[WonderLight789]

Natali Sanders variant

I have no issue with sexyness. But that cover looks tacky in my opinion. There are other takes on Diana that make her look sensual but this one is not one of them.

[Gaius]

I have no issue with sexyness. But that cover looks tacky in my opinion. There are other takes on Diana that make her look sensual but this one is not one of them.

It's something alright.

Wouldn't look out of place at the some of the magazines I see at my grocery store, I'll give that at least.

[Primal Slayer]

I have no issue with sexyness. But that cover looks tacky in my opinion. There are other takes on Diana that make her look sensual but this one is not one of them.

For once we agree.

[I'm a Fish]

The costume reminds me of the 2010 pilot...

[Gaius]

The costume reminds me of the 2010 pilot...

The head is what had me cock an eyebrow.

[The I.A.D.C.]

The head is what had me cock an eyebrow.

For me it was the platform stripper boots! Now, I love and prefer the classic red boot with the white stripe, but those are way extra!

[I'm a Fish]

This cover feels like something Rucka would address in his first run by having Diana pick up the magazine and say, “I want to teach them world peace, but all they want to learn is my diet and makeup routine…”

[Hypo]

That's a variant? ......I dont understand.

It's a retailer exclusive variant, so not something commissioned by DC.

[Gaius]

This cover feels like something Rucka would address in his first run by having Diana pick up the magazine and say, “I want to teach them wold peace, but all they want to learn is my diet and makeup routine…”

[Largo161]

It's a retailer exclusive variant, so not something commissioned by DC.

Say what now? A retailer can put a cover on a DC book without DC having any say?

[Hypo]

Say what now? A retailer can put a cover on a DC book without DC having any say?

I mean I'm sure there's some standards like no nudity etc, but for a retailer exclusive cover a retailer is committing to buying 3000+ copies of an issue which gets them the ability to commission an artist to create an exclusive cover for their store:

Bleeding Cool: CoverWatch: Retailer Exclusive Covers Options from Marvel & DC Comics

To get an exclusive retailer cover from Marvel or DC, shops, shows or creators have to order a minimum of 3000 copies, with subsequent variants of the variant at 1500 and 1000. They pay the full wholesale price, plus the artist's cost – unless they are representing the artist themselves. These can be sold for premium prices or used for promotional purposes as they often have the name of the store somewhere. They have also been very handy for publishers looking to bump the numbers on a title, adding tens of thousands of orders to a comic book just by making this option available. An increase in availability from Marvel dulled the "specialness" of these covers, and DC Comics has been increasing the number of issues they make available for this as well.

[Largo161]

I mean I'm sure there's some standards like no nudity etc, but for a retailer exclusive cover a retailer is committing to buying 3000+ copies of an issue which gets them the ability to commission an artist to create an exclusive cover for their store:

Bleeding Cool: CoverWatch: Retailer Exclusive Covers Options from Marvel & DC Comics

I see. Thx

[rayray1127]

Natali Sanders variant

Wow.... Is this how some people see Diana? I understand art is subjective, but this is gross to me....

[Gaius]

https://twitter.com/marcio_takara/st...64197051437068



https://twitter.com/marcio_takara/st...11390125690882

[Stanlos]

I feel this collection should have had Byrne and Luke era entries. Kinda weird it didn't. Especially over inclusion of some other later eras. But a very handsome volume