Tarantino's Star Trek
Noah Hawley's Star Trek
Matt Shakman's Star Trek
S. J Clarkson Star Trek
Rob Orci's Star Trek.
Precisely No. It is about breathing new life to a series. no one is trying to make trek what it isnt, many just want fresh blood to expand what is already a rich universe and give us something new while staying faithful to the very core of what star trek should be.
I believe this are some of the reasons why the 2009 film was a success, however the sequel (Star Trek Into Darkness) failed in many ways when it tired to be a rehash of Wrath of Khan
I could not possibly support Tarantino as a Star Trek director. He would insist on making a Tarantino movie, not a Star Trek movie.
Inglorious Bastards and Django Unchained for 2 good examples are very much still movies about Slavery, Westerns and World War 2, just with a Tarantino's touch. I am thinking his Star Trek would have been very much the same.
I don't know enough about the S.J. Clarkson, Noah Hawley, or Matt Shakman projects to comment one way or the other. Tarantino just seemed like the wrong choice through and through (beyond his R-rated brand not fitting, his idea was just too convoluted). Orci's project actually sounded really good, however, he wasn't a strong writer, so I strongly question how well the execution would've been.
Doctor Strange: "You are the right person to replace Logan."
X-23: "I know there are people who disapprove... Guys on the Internet mainly."
(All-New Wolverine #4)