I will concede and agree that Jean's power signature is not in the image. But that's because, as I noted in my previous post, I don't believe Ororo's defenses were aimed at either of them as much as at the tree, which was stripped bare. First, Emma's power signature is nowhere to be found when the lightning actually strikes the tree. (The blue and purple streaks running through the white light are gaps in the lightning revealing parts of the tree and sky.) Had she effectively shielded herself and Jean, it would have been depicted by something a bit more evocative than a third-eye spark.
Second, the next page shows an outline of Ororo's visage looming above and staring down at them. It's almost as if she tested them to see what they would do before unlocking a door (the tree?) and letting them further inside.
And yes, enough with the back and forth about this.
Actually, no, as Dauterman's quote clearly states, "In a few spots, I have Emma's power signature taking the vague shape of a crown
as a nod to her personality." He says nothing about it representing her telepathic "precision."
But she is more powerful than Emma, both according to canon and by virtue of the fact that she has never chosen to abuse people, including children, of her own volition. Abusive, predatory people are by nature weak individuals.
Since these are fictional characters and all, it's clear Hickman chose to put her back in that costume and has yet to adequately explain why except for vaguely referencing her death in the Dark Phoenix Saga, which, based on canon, wasn't even her. I mean, I get the connection, but it isn't consistent with how she had been developed leading up to and right before his run. Perhaps he will delve into this during
Inferno...
In either case, even in that hideous dress, she is beloved - they even released an action figure of it, lol - so, no harm, no foul. She has survived much worse as a fictional character.