Originally Posted by
HypnoHustler
The issue is now available on Comixology.
I only have time to skim it right now (at work in my time zone).
From what I’ve read I don’t think it’s as bad as some have made out to be, but the spoilers were accurate. I’ll give further thoughts later. I will say it’s very telling that Spencer does not have any goodbye letter for the conclusion of his run (instead we randomly get one from Nick Lowe).
To be honest, I was more interested in the Ben Reilly back-up. That is a big gift for Ben fans who have been clamoring for some acknowledgement of his 90s continuity and supporting cast from that era, especially a felonious redhead.
EDIT:
Okay, the issue wasn't terrible. It wasn't as good as it should've been, but I had braced myself for disappointment in advance. Some OMD stuff is still hinted at. But yeah, a pretty big disappointment. And nothing much changes at all. Peter and MJ are in a quasi-relationship and it's status quo. Honestly, in some ways those fake 4Chan spoilers from a few weeks back might've been better (and while it got plenty wrong, a couple plot points were accurate). The Harry clone dies (no degeneration though). Tbh that's probably the ballsiest thing to come out of this issue. I've never liked Harry being back (I know there are some who do), and always thought he should have stayed dead. Glad Spec #200's importance is kind of reinstated. It's comics though, so I'm sure some writer will bring him back... again... in a decade. As for Gabriel and Sarah... I don't know. A lot of convoluted baloney. Good to have Sins Past retconned, now hopefully they never refer to Kindred or the Stacy twins again. Doctor Strange and Mephisto had some good exchanges, and I did like the images of Mephisto's future (of course that was the first thing spoiled from this issue). As for Norman, I've said before I'm not a fan of him being good. He's totally uninteresting as some meek, guilt-ridden saint. Norman should always be an evil POS, so I hope he reverts to form next time he appears.
The two back-ups... the first one I'm sure has been done before. Multiple times, probably. It's the cliched Peter-runs-into-an-old-friend-of-Uncle-Ben-who-talks-about-how-great-Ben-was boilerplate nonsense with perhaps a small twist that still doesn't justify it. I expected more of Gage, who I know is a good writer.
The Ben Reilly story, I did enjoy. But that may just be a product of me being a Reilly fan. Your mileage may vary. But it was great to see Janine back, and it was competently scripted with solid art (better than some art in the main story tbh).
Overall, I'd give the book a B- as I did find it an okay read at face-value. But if you're looking it as the conclusion of Spencer's masterplan, then it obviously disappoints. Overall, I'd give Spencer's uneven run about a C average. (Still better than Slott)
Some non-story stuff bothered me as well. For example:
The art was really inconsistent. Some of the art was nice, and then you'd have an abrupt shift to another artist who was sub-par for a few pages.
Second, wow, they did Spencer kind of dirty. Nick Lowe wrote a letter thanking fans for reading the entire Kindred saga. As he lists the people who contributed (starting with the letterers and colorists for some inane reason), Spencer gets literally two sentences (literally... and one of those sentences is "thanks, Nick"). I don't know how true the rumors are of editorial interference, but this leads me to believe things ended on a pretty sour note.