Originally Posted by
Grunty
Call me a cynic, but my experience with the cape comics of the big 2 at this point has given me the impression, that the subject matter and the specialization of the selected artists is not suited to display large fights or conflicts between full blown groups of super beings in a dynamic or "epic" manner.
The artistic focus of super hero comics (western or eastern) are stand out individuals, hence why fights either boil down to very small groups of individuals fighting against each other with enough "room" to let them each show their specilizations in one on one encounters (see Captain America: Civil War), OR small groups of individuals against large hordes of generic often faceless grunts/mooks/henchmen, where the individuals can show off by cutting/bashing/blasting down underpowered enemies in mass (see Avengers Endgame).
And unlike other works of heroic stories, they are explicitly not tied to factions which would provide massive armies to back them up, because the whole value of super heros is that they independent and can do everything by themself.
The only exceptions are splash pages where the artist will try to cram as many individuals into a singular scene as possible and have each shown fighting someone to indicate a large scale battle going on, but offers very little dynamic in getting a good understanding of how the fight might be "fair" or how strong any of the sides are.
It's one reason i have started to consider the idea of a mutant army to be a hollow concept, since one major aspects of mutants is that their super powers are entirely randomized which makes forming an army which depends on uniformity of individuals for tactical cohesion a logistic nightmare. Compared to Avatar where the super powers were at least grouped into 4 general elements, allowing each bender to fullfill different styles or roles of combat.
Even in the Krakoa status quo where millions of mutants are grouped together in a nation, the focus lies on a small elite of powerfull beings single handedly bringing victory, rather than the nation having a proper militarized fighting force.
Because their very nature makes coordination of mass units of mutants impossible. At least if the focus is entirely on fighting with powers (as opposed to giving every underpowered mutant a gun, which would make them no more better than unpowered humans).
In addition to that the Krakoan mutants and the Children of the vault explicitly lack the structurs to employ large masses of backround filling "mooks", as the former are explicitly not mass militarized and as hero faction can only ever muster the named characters, while the later are also highly focused on using individuals to the point where there are barely more than 10 Children of the Vault ever shown or used.
Overall there is a reason why all the big wars, which were remarked to have taken place in the history shown in HOX/POX were only ever shown in their aftermath or via very narrow images of Moira standing besides a partner in victory or defeat. The established iconography of these comics aren't meant for detailed depictions of multi-frontal wars and they mostly don't have the artist to provide it.
A victory of mutants is usualy shown by them standing on rubble with dead people and non-mutant heros around them. A victory of Children of the Vault would be similar only with heros from all side lying among the bodies around them. A victory of Sentinels is usualy them standing on a mountain of (human looking) bodies or skulls or flying over ruined cities. The wars themself are never fully shown, because these settings are not suited for proper depiction of large scale wars. Especialy since the X-men lack the quality to provide themself a large army of generic grunts to fill the ranks that clash against other large forces.
Also there is the over reliance of Deus Ex Machinas happening off pannel or in singular recap images. Where the narrative will just say "And then Jean Grey gave everyone an headache and the mutants beat the Avengers." Or "And then Nimrod unleashed a neo-legacy virus and 17 million mutants were dead." and that was that for the victory or defeat.
As such a mini-series about the various wars of the human groups with super powers would not be very "epic" visualy or narratively from my perspective. Beause these works don't have the basis for making it work since the established narrative tools, artistic focus and value of characters, compared to other types of science fiction and fantasy.
That is not to say you can't make epic conflicts in super hero comics. But it needs a specific groundwork, which this conflict does not have.
Of course i might be dead wrong, again i admit i have a much more sober look at what can be done in super hero comics, based on past examples.
On a side note. I refuse to see it as a war between "species". Mutants are humans and the "human" side would involve super powered people at the forfront who are as "detached" from normal humans (or downright aren't human) as mutants are, furthermore making it a conflict of proclaimed or insisted "identities" rather than species.
The only case i see for such a war involving 3 "species" would be if it's about humans (powered by X-gene or otherwise and unpowered), machines (Sentinels) and beings no longer comparable to humans in any way but shape (post-humans, cyber-humans, aliens, demons, etc.).
But as long as it's only mutants and unpowered humans, it's just another inter-human war based on ideologies, identities and overly focused differences between groups. In general a retreat of colonization era ideologies, but with weapons of mass destruction at both sides' finger tips.