Main cast.
Sinister
Exodus
Destiny
Mystique
Emma
Colossus
One-Two Arrako mutants.
Main cast.
Sinister
Exodus
Destiny
Mystique
Emma
Colossus
One-Two Arrako mutants.
This is a great little post for those who want to know a little more without knowing more, lol.I’ll be doing interviews shortly, and I’ll be more specific about the identities of my core cast, though there’s names in the press release. For now let’s keep it to “The Quiet Council.”
https://buttondown.email/KieronGille...alf-symposium/
Really intrigued by this. A book I rellay wanted but I hope Magneto is in it too. Really like Charles and Eric in this Era. Also Phoenix and Death make this more interesting.
Would've been actually stoked had this been released before Inferno. Oh well, will give it a shot anyway due to it being pretty much advertised as a must-read-otherwise-the-next-event-won't-make-a-lick-of-sense.
This actually sounds super interesting. I’ve always loved the soap opera drama side of the xmen. Not everything needs some huge resolution. Just give me mutants + drama.
This may be the first thing I buy since house of x 2
Your favorite superhero- the one you visit these forums to talk about. Would they talk to others the way you do on this message board?
People keep catching little details...
These stand out the most to me.
Sinister = Judas Iscariot
Death = Mary Magdalene
Worth taking note of...
https://www.thoughtco.com/john-or-ma...-supper-182499
Is Mary Magdalene in Da Vinci's 'The Last Supper?'Was Mary Magdalene at the Last Supper?
In "The Last Supper," the figure at Christ's right arm does not possess an easily-identified gender. He's not bald, or bearded, or anything we visually associate with "masculinity." In fact, he looks feminine. As a result, some people (like the novelist Dan Brown in "The Da Vinci Code") have speculated that Da Vinci wasn't depicting John at all, but rather Mary Magdalene. There are three very good reasons why Leonardo was likely not depicting Mary Magdalene.
1. Mary Magdalene wasn't at the Last Supper.
Although she was present at the event, Mary Magdalene wasn't listed among the people at the table in any of the four Gospels. According to Biblical accounts, her role was a minor supporting one. She wiped feet. John is described as eating at the table with the others.
2. It would have been blatant heresy for Da Vinci to paint her there.
Late 15th-century Catholic Rome was not a period of enlightenment with regard to competing religious beliefs. The Inquisition began in the late 12th century France. The Spanish Inquisition began in 1478 and 50 years after "The Last Supper" was painted, Pope Paul II established the Congregation of the Holy Office of the Inquisition in Rome itself. The most famous victim of this office was in 1633, Leonardo's fellow scientist Galileo Galilei.
Leonardo was an inventor and experimenter in all things, but it would have been worse than foolhardy for him to risk offending both his employer and his Pope.
3. Leonardo was known for painting effeminate men.
There is controversy over whether Leonardo was gay or not. Whether he was or wasn't, he certainly devoted more attention to male anatomy and beautiful males in general than he did to female anatomy or females. There are some rather sensuous young men depicted in his notebooks, complete with long, curly tresses and modestly downcast, heavy-lidded eyes. The faces of some of these men are similar to that of John.
Based on this, it seems clear that Da Vinci painted the apostle John swooning next to Christ, and not Mary Magdalene. "The Da Vinci Code" is interesting and thought-provoking. However, it is a work of fiction and a creative tale woven by Dan Brown based on a bit of history that goes well above and beyond the historical facts.
"Danielle... I intend to do something rash and violent." - Betsy Braddock
Krakoa, Arakko, and Otherworld forever!
Werneck’s interiors disappoint unfortunately.