Originally Posted by
Carl Krummet
See, I think that your "true longtime fan" line shows that you missed the point I was trying to make. That makes it sound like you're claiming to be superior to other fans of the character and are entitled to ownership over defining who the character is. We don't own this character. We don't get to define him. DC is allowed to develop him as they see fit. Fans can hope for whatever changes or interpretations they want. Starting fights over this is silly and could alienate potential fans of the character, reducing his popularity and chances he keeps appearing in comics, TV, etc.
I also think you somewhat misunderstand the meaning of "character trait." You cited red hair as a character trait of Wally, for instance. How does that affect the core of the character? I think you'd agree that that's like saying Commissioner Gordon in The Batman isn't really the same character because his skin color is different. Or, more relevant to our exchange, saying SB is no longer himself anytime his costume changes. Heck, I hated the t-shirt look at first, but I kept following the character.
I think imagining changes to a character is a pretty normal part of being an invested fan. I don't see speculating his sexuality changing as any more "fanfic" than speculating changing his eye color to green, giving him a new costume, and/or altering his continuity to include the New 52 version.
And of course I know that Conner is more than quips and hitting stuff. But if I were asked to describe him to someone with no understanding of who he is, his sexuality would not be at the top of my list. If we were discussing Hawaii SB almost 30 years ago, then maybe. But not in his current iteration. Besides, if you go back and read early SB, I think you'd agree that the forced kisses planted on strangers, inappropriate comments excused as flirting, etc. has not aged well.
Like I said at the outset, I hate seeing this argument on here. I just don't think it's constructive. So I'd like this post to be the last time I address it (I'm not holding my breath though). Nonetheless, I'd be interested to hear your honest response to a couple of questions:
1.) If asked to describe Kon, what three basic characteristics would you use?
2.) If his character were written as homosexual (but the same character in every other way) in a new, in-continuity book, would you not buy it?
(For me: 1. Clone of Superman/Luthor, always striving to be better, and a loyal friend & 2. Yes, of course)