Do you think Gambit will appear in Sins of SInister?
The latest Immortal X-Men seems focus on the Black Womb Project (last mentioned in Carey X-Men , and who was on the mission ....Gambit and Prof X?
Do you think Gambit will appear in Sins of SInister?
The latest Immortal X-Men seems focus on the Black Womb Project (last mentioned in Carey X-Men , and who was on the mission ....Gambit and Prof X?
I wouldn't create much hope. Few characters might appear already in the first issues of each book, that happens 10 years in the future. The second issues are 100 years into the future, most characters might be chimeras and new versions of characters. Perhaps one of the Nightcrawlers is a chimera of Kurt and Remy. That would be cool actually.
I don’t think he’ll be in SoS unless it’s kind of like how he was in the x-over where Sinister was just keeping a cage full of exploding Gambit clones. I’m all good with him not being involved bc I don’t need any more body horror mutilation nastiness. I’m still trying to recover from Gambit #5. I don’t love characters being reduced to their powers anyway. He’ll be better off over in Cap Marvel and Rogue & Gambit and then whatever new team comes out of that. Still a possibility he’s Sinister’s son or something like that.
Gambit chimeras? Gambit/Multiple Man, bc there’d be more of him and he’d be an unstoppable force with the ability to talk/annoy people to death. Destiny as Mystique would have conniptions. Rogue, luckiest woman alive.
Okay, more serious choice, Gambit/Shadowcat/Tempo = most amazing thief ever.
Also it wouldn't be the first time there was a storyline in which a particular character would make a lot of sense to be involved in because of their history or relationships to central characters of said story, only to be left out because the writer wasn't interested in using them or unaware they had these qualities for their story.
What about Gambit/Blink?
Last edited by Gripstir; 11-19-2022 at 08:34 PM.
No, though I see your logic. The writer ‘favoritism’ seems bigger than ever. Character sketches for SoS have been released, and we have a monstrous version of nightcrawler, a chimera of nightcrawler and Wolverine and a chimera of nightcrawler, domino and sinister (because she has card symbols on her outfit and duggan and spurrier have reassigned card imagery to sinister now, which makes total sense…) there is also something mister in a new outfit and a sinister captain America. So out of the like 8 character sketches, nearly half are the same two characters. So I’m not expecting anything different from the event.
Ayup. But in this instance, I’m perfectly okay with it. Rogue fans got majorly robbed during Inferno, a big emotional miss that should have had more impact than it did. There doesn’t seem to be anything character building or emotional in SOS I could feel invested in. Gambit doesn’t need to be involved in “breaking characters down to their utilities.” In Immortal, Sinister was using Sebastian Shaw meat to power his spaceship. To be fair, that’s the best use of Shaw to date, but I really don’t need to see Gambit’s dismembered body being used as a battery or something grosser. Hard pass.
When Harley Quinn sees her closet has been raided, she’s gonna be so pissed.
I really don’t understand why Sinister is appropriating the playing card motif. I’m both confused and annoyed.
Hey it’s thanksgiving hope all American and non Americans alike are having a good day.
I’m thankful for Gambit being my favorite character in all of fiction
And I’m thankful I found this picture cause I love it.
What things about Gambit are y’all thankful for?
Nice! Gambit has always been very high on my top 10 favorite fictional characters list(yeah, I enjoy making lists), and is easily my favorite comic book character.
I am thankful that Tini Howard is no longer using Gambit, and I too am thankful for the upcoming Rogue and Gambit mini.