Thanks.
Well, considering he also screwed over Spidey to hype up other characters, it is moot if him doing that means there's an actual dislike.I would argue that Slott did go through a period where he was out to assassinate MJ and actively wrote her at the expense of trying to hype Carlie (which backfired spectacularly). I don’t think he necessarily had animus toward MJ in particular, but I’m betting he did that because he thought that’s what Quesada et al wanted - a story that tried to make people dislike the pre-OMD status quo (again, backfired spectacularly). He would have treated any female character who had a previous relationship with Peter poorly (and he did the same to Felicia) (I would argue he did the same to Peter).
I do think there was to an extent a dislike for the relationship itself, but even that is hard to tell.
Also Carlie herself was basically humiliated in Spider-Island, because that was the story designated to make MJ look good, so Carlie doesn't do much and becomes a Spider-Monster, though, she did get the last word in when leaving in ASM#673, with that silly scene where she talks like Peter is just a mask for Spider-Man and Spidey doesn't really deny that, which makes no sense with Spidey's usual characterization, or Slott's own characterization, and he did something like that at least three times (In Superior#30, script by Gage, Otto says that Spidey holds himself back because deep down he knows he's smarter than everyone else, something that is completely contradicted by the fact he was working on Horizon Labs and was at least once shown to be glad he's making a difference, and in ASM#23 vol 4, co-written by Gage, we have Gwen saying that Spidey is so used to being miserable that he doesn't even try to be happy, though, at least, in that one Spidey replies to that by saying she didn't major in psychology and to drop it).
I think he can understand that to an extent, but his way of writing stories is the more cartoonish one with random stuff happening with characters, basically like modern Simpsons.But again, that’s because Slott writes for action figures and their play sets. Asking him to understand characterization is like asking a starfish to perform differential equations - it just doesn’t compute.
Yeah I heard Bobbi got screwed over, between this and how she showed up in Parker Industries era in ASM, if Bobbi fans don't want her anywhere near Spidey again, I can't blame 'em lol.Wells is interesting because he can write a well-told story but he has been consistently dismissive if not downright destructive to MJ over the years. I don’t know if it’s MJ as a character or if he just can’t write morally good civilian female characters who aren’t a generic archetype like Mother (aka Aunt May). And while they fall more into the superhero category, his Bobbi and Felicia in ASM 900 were also egregiously awful.
Spidey being nerfed might be more of a way modern Marvel thinks he has to be written, a miserable punching bag.But then, I could also argue his Spider-Man is also off - he has consistently nerfed Peter and took away his smarts. His Flash was as egregious as Bobbi and Felicia in 900.
Like I understand why that's done to an extent, while other heroes were generally more succesful at life, Spidey generally struggled more even when winning battles, and many times he wins and still feels like he lost, that is part of the core of what made Spidey stand out so much, the thing is, even with how ridiculously over dramatic and poorly written Spidey could be in old comics (Seriously, ASM#13 has Spidey gaslighting himself into thinking he became a villain when sleeping because apparently only he could have Spider-Powers), he did get plenty of wins alongsides his losses, and in Ditko's run, Master Planner trilogy is generally seen as the best story he wrote (And it's even what made me check out the rest of his run to begin with), and that is a story where Spidey unambiguously won after working very hard.
So yeah, Spidey gets punched in the face, but the important thing is, he punches back, and the fact his victories can screw him over is part of the charm, but he still needs unambiguous victories to keep things interesting, because if he's getting beaten up, it feels more rewarding when he wins, and if he's winning a lot, then it hurts more when he loses, this kind of flexibility is important, and unfortunately Spidey can lose too much and just, not be interesting.
Don't forget babies being hurt.Maybe it’s just that Wells only has affinity for villains and the morally grey, with an especial liking for those who eat others.
He'll probably have a lot of fun with those lol.Seriously, Wells and Marvel Zombies is a truly inspired pairing.
But yeah, Wells, he's an edgelord as far as I've seen, he doesn't take it as far as Mark Millar or Garth Ennis, but it's still there lol.