Neither do I because that's not what I'm doing. I pointed out the "poster boy" of the GL franchise DC has traditionally marketed for the better part of the past half century now. One Lantern being prioritized doesn't mean they're out to "get" someone else, even if we ignore what happened in the 90s, it means their marketing efforts are concentrated around that particular character and therefore he will be the one to receive majority of the attention. I find nothing controversial in pointing this out, for example they indeed wouldn't let Andy Schmidt use Earth-3 Hal in his Crime Syndicate book even though the character descriptions were released and Emerald Knight was originally slated to be Hal, in the last minute that was changed to John who was reimagined as a Coast City native trained by Sinestro. Based on many different examples over the years over how the default Lantern has been treated, I have no reason to believe that pointing out the way DC has traditionally done business with this franchise should be equated to griping about how "they're out to get Hal".