Originally Posted by
Bored at 3:00AM
While I agree that the age up didn't work out the way DC had originally hoped, it did make some sense at the time.
As others have pointed out, Ollie was also being depicted as middle aged so doing the same for Hal wasn't exactly a crazy thought. Granted, Ollie's age up also ended up in his getting replaced by a younger hero.
However, that was mostly due to the change in editorial regimes from Dick Giordano to Mike Carlin, who, like yourself, hated the idea of older superheroes so much he cancelled the JSA's book and killed off or retired most of them.
Giordano had a different perspective. Since comics fans were aging, He thought having some heroes age a bit further past the perpetual 29 could be worthwhile. Carlin quite obviously disagreed and changed course, just as Didio reversed many of Carlin's edicts once he took over, which is how we got Hal back as GL back in the first place.
Having Hal & Ollie a decade older than the rest of the founding JLAers made sense, as those two were often a step apart from their teammates. Hal was a war veteran and, at that time, the last war America had fought in was Vietnam, so that pretty much required Hal to be older.
Of course, these days pretty much all contemporary DC superheroes of the Silver Age are middle aged, but no one draws attention to it by giving them any signs of aging, which is probably the safer approach. No point drawing attention to the fact that these heroes are older if they might potentially turn off readers who wouldn't want to be reading about a character they'd deem...ew...old.