Exactly my thinking.
It doesn't make sense. Xavier/Magneto's plan was to build up mutant-kind into an uber-powerful civilization the likes of the world have never seen.
How does she want to enact her plan when mutants are at the strongest point in their existence?
She could and should have done whatever it is she planned when she was at their weakest.
I think that until we get that Moira story in the context of the retcon (which judging from the ending here we will at some point), we need to assume that she went for a more surgical strike here because of Destiny's threat from her previous life. If she tried something so overt she likely could've been caught and stopped before she could do much of anything. Not to mention, in one of her life's the Phoenix Five happened, so House of M likely took place in some form there too, so maybe she tried that before and it didn't take like how she wanted.
Yeah not liking what Hickman did with Moira here.
Frankly, he's been oblivious to most of the "intricate emotional connections" between characters. Then again, he has admitted that the characters were supposed to feel off. I think he was going to reveal some nefarious manipulation of all mutants by either Krakoa or Xavier at some point.
Jean Grey in the words of Walt Whitman, from his masterpiece Leaves of Grass, "Song of Myself" (51 and 52):
"Do I contradict myself? Very well then I contradict myself, (I am large, I contain multitudes.)"
"Failing to fetch me at first keep encouraged, Missing me one place search another, I stop somewhere waiting for you."
I was trying to do too much and not doing any of it as well as I could. But I've had a change of mind... though not everyone shall enjoy it. I will.
#midnightermonday #uglystepchildren #lolgbtcomedyshow
Tumblr: http://newmutantmayhem.tumblr.com/
IG: https://www.instagram.com/ginger_drew/
Please! is it too much to hope the information from inferno shocks peter out of what mikhal is doing to him because if mikhal gets all this info because of Peter, oy vey.
Don't let anyone else hold the candle that lights the way to your future because only you can sustain the flame.
Number of People on my ignore list: 0
#conceptualthinking ^_^
#ByeMarvEN
Into the breach.
https://www.instagram.com/jartist27/
"To the X-men then, who don´t die the old fashioned way and no matter how hard we try, none of us die forever" Uncanny X-Men #270, Jean and Ororo
Magneto: The master of magnetism Appreciation 2022
Polaris: The Mistress of Magnetism Appreciation 2022
House of M Appreciation 2022
haha lowkey i just had the funny thought that one of hickmans biggest complaints was that none of the mutants ever age and therefore don't grow but the entire council just gained thousands of years of intel so like Synch they all have been aged in a sense. lol
Don't let anyone else hold the candle that lights the way to your future because only you can sustain the flame.
Number of People on my ignore list: 0
#conceptualthinking ^_^
#ByeMarvEN
Into the breach.
https://www.instagram.com/jartist27/
Sound a fury, signifying nothing.
4 issues to change almost nothing. An entire relaunch has just been endlessly spinning its wheels. I suppose I should be grateful they didn't just fridge Moira. And has Destiny been even remotely useful since she's been brought back? Endless "the future possibilities are too vast!". We were told she was like some kind of uber dangerous demon with vast future sight in HoXPoX, and now she didn't even see Doug coming.
Just a colossal waste of time. At no point in their entire history did Xavier try to peak at what Moira really wants? One of the most paranoid and controlling figures in Marvel, second only to Reed Richards, maybe?
OK. I have read this thing again, to see if I have missed something... and it doesn't make any f***ing sense...
Moira has built Krakoa together with Magneto and Xavier. She has worked on it for decades. She even had a child as part of the plan... Why would she do that, if her plan is to re-create her cure? How does creating Krakoa advances her plan to create a cure without getting killed? And if she has changed her mind... why? WHY?! Mutants are doing better than ever, the only hiccup in the Krakoa plan is that they can't kill Nimrod, but that could be solved by having Magik teleport Magneto, Polaris, Exodus, Iceman, Legion, Vulcan and both Xorns (instead of X-Force or the Brood), and blowing the Orchis Forge to cinders from within...
I thought that maybe they were speaking about the cure she developed during her third life, but if so, why calling her a liar and traitor to her own kind? She has been helping mutankind during seven lives and more than 1,200 years afterwards, she has redeemed herself a million times since she created that cure...
Nope, she must be creating her cure now... but if so... WHAT'S THE POINT OF KRAKOA?!
All I can think is, Hickman is pissed because his plans were hijacked and warped by others, and he crapped a shitty, senseless end for the story arc because he thinks Marvel neither can appreciate nor deserves better from him...
Last edited by Habis; 01-05-2022 at 02:03 PM.
I know people are big on the theory that there was some insidious reveal being planned for why Krakoans are the way they are, in terms of the aspects people don't like about their characterizations or the things they go along with.....but I would honestly be shocked if that were true. For it all to be some kind of manipulation of the average mutant by Xavier or someone else would undermine the entire point and pathos of a lot of the ideas and themes Hickman built up. There's no weight, no conflict to a story about moral ambiguity or conflict between races if the majority of the choices being made are actually just being driven by a singular party or influence without most of the players having real agency in building up that ambiguity or conflict.
Personally I think Occam's Razor is the answer here. Hickman's just not good at the finer points of characterization because he prioritizes big picture ideas and has no problem adjusting motivations to enable his plots rather than using characterization to drive his plots. He's the kind of writer who views characters as being tools meant to be drafted in service to a story, rather than stories being tools to be drafted in service to the characters. Its a choice of priorities and one I feel he makes with clear intent.
I know that interview had him talking about how he wanted the resurrection concept to hammer home the idea that there's something inherently unrelatable about mutant society, something that breaks up the reader instinct to side with mutants and forces us to make a tangible choice as to whether we WANT to side with them in this story versus innately viewing them as our gateway POV to the story and thus just meant to side with them by default. I think people have built that statement of his up to mean more than it actually does though, when they use it to try and explain away parts of the story and character choices they simply don't agree with. I didn't get the impression that was what he was saying when he talked about wanting resurrection to make Krakoan society somewhat unrelatable. Nowhere in that interview did he say that he wanted the resurrection concept or anything else to make Krakoan society seem SKETCHY to readers or UNLIKABLE.....simply to express that Krakoan society had aspects that made it outside the realm of human relatability. Something that made it so readers couldn't take it for granted that Krakoans would react to things the same way readers would.....because there were things within Krakoan lived experiences that are fundamentally outside of any readers' lived experiences.
(Tbh, its part of the gripe I mentioned having with his overall approach to Krakoa earlier in the thread. I think stuff like that was done deliberately by Hickman not to layer in hints that something insidious lurks at the heart of Krakoa, but rather just to move the story he was trying to tell about a race of superhuman beings away from the default X-books setting of an allegory to real life marginalized societies. I think Hickman deliberately set out to craft a story that wasn't meant to be allegorical but rather just high concept sci-fi......which is where I think he fundamentally missed the mark with a lot of readers, because for a lot of us there IS no setting aside the allegory that we see as baked into the X-Men on a conceptual level).