What Batman writer's addiction to always having the dc universe job out to make batman look cool (and yet he still looks goofy as hell to force in the artificial threat)? it doesn't make the threat look intimidating nor does it make batman look cool anymore all it does is show the blatant favoritism & unoriginality modern batman stories have been on loop since new 52
it not even frustrating just boring by now
That was great, reminiscent of Morrison's prepared Batman.
It's all writers can seemingly think of when writing Tim in recent years. Putting other characters down to tell us how great he is in comparison.
Even in a situation when having a partner who doesn't just follow everything you tell him, who is more of a wild card, would probably have been better, considering that Failsafe's whole thing is to know Bruce so well that he can anticipate everything that Bruce is going to do. Which means Tim is probably pretty easy to predict too since he's just doing exactly what Bruce wants him to do.
This arc sounds like a parody.
If I understand correctly, Batman subconsciously built a robot that has taken over Gotham and defeated pretty much the entire superhero population?
We are at a point now where Bruce can beat every other hero in his sleep essentially.
Now he's surviving the vacuum of space and re-entry into Earth's atmosphere.
I'm feel like we're waiting for a punchline.
Yeah, I didn't care for this.
I didn't hate it but I didn't love it either.
The root of the problem I have with this storyline is Failsafe. IMO, he's way too powerful to work as a reoccuring villain to Batman and I get that's supposed to be the point as Zdarsky referred to Failsafe as "Batman's Doomsday", but I don't see how something like that works long term because a concept like that is more compatibile for Superman than Batman.
I mean, I sorta get the point the story is trying to make. Failsafe is this amalgamation of Bruce's mistakes and flaws and the jobbing of the JL is basically about Bruce not being able to weasel himself out of the situation for once (even though he kinda does) even with the help of his family/friends.
But everything is so literal and over-the-top if feels... weird.
Yes - surely, surely there's some twist coming? Batman's continued intrusive thoughts about his death, the parodic excess/nightmare logic of the action, the way Zur En Ah is kept as an active concern/figure of delusion in the back-ups but hasn't been a cameo really in the main title...
There *has* to be a justifying twist on its way, right?
(Didn't much care for one or the more triumphant "Batman And Robin" dynamic duo moments in recent years ending in apparent failure either.)
What gets me is that those critiques are already exhausting. I don't want to see anymore excessive focus on how horrible Batman is or the JL jobbing to him.
It runs into the whole issue of "I'm critiquing this trope by playing it as straight as possible". Like regardless if your being self-referential or not, your still doing the thing your pointing out.
Well it depends on how well-received the story and character is after this I guess. At the very least Doomsday's at the time blank slate-ness meant you could at least explore his origins, while here we already know everything Failsafe is and comes from.
Last edited by Mantis-Ray; 12-07-2022 at 11:43 AM.