View Poll Results: Preferred WW title logo

Voters
31. You may not vote on this poll
  • Logo 1

    3 9.68%
  • Logo 2

    5 16.13%
  • Logo 3

    0 0%
  • Logo 4

    0 0%
  • Logo 5

    3 9.68%
  • Logo 6

    2 6.45%
  • Logo 7

    4 12.90%
  • Logo 8

    0 0%
  • Logo 9

    3 9.68%
  • Logo 10

    10 32.26%
  • Other

    1 3.23%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23
  1. #16
    Mighty Member Avi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    1,739

    Default

    Best: 9,10, 5
    Worst: 3, 7

  2. #17
    Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    18,747

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Koriand'r View Post
    It always bugged me that for some reason the o and n are practicing social distancing but all the other letters touch.
    It's just a trick of perspective. All the fronts of the letters are evenly spaced, but they're supposed to be three-dimensional and your focal point is centre and above--so some letters are to right and others left. If you imagine changing your focal point--right, left, below--the perspective would change and some sides would seem to "touch" or not "touch," depending on the angle.

    Really, I have to respect the letterer for respecting perspective and not cheating the image--he had to see in his mind how the letters would appear in three dimensions from a specific focal point.

    You know, I thought about this a lot back in the day, staring at the logo so much and trying to figure out why the letters had to be that way. If they had "touched" it would actually be wrong from that perspective and it would have bugged some readers who understood those principles.

  3. #18
    Astonishing Member Koriand'r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    3,796

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Kelly View Post
    It's just a trick of perspective. All the fronts of the letters are evenly spaced, but they're supposed to be three-dimensional and your focal point is centre and above--so some letters are to right and others left. If you imagine changing your focal point--right, left, below--the perspective would change and some sides would seem to "touch" or not "touch," depending on the angle.

    Really, I have to respect the letterer for respecting perspective and not cheating the image--he had to see in his mind how the letters would appear in three dimensions from a specific focal point.

    You know, I thought about this a lot back in the day, staring at the logo so much and trying to figure out why the letters had to be that way. If they had "touched" it would actually be wrong from that perspective and it would have bugged some readers who understood those principles.
    STL143647.jpg

    Nice try, but no. Say the entire logo were a decal or a sticker, that would be the weakest part and it would probably break when you pulled if off the backing if you weren't extremly careful. Forced perspective or not the red shadow of the o still should have touched the yellow of the n, if only for the sake of symetry and clean lines. Take this X-Men font for example, the red shadow of the hyphen touches the yellow of the X.

    6a00e54ee394bf8833010535f439fa970c-800wi.jpg

  4. #19

    Default

    Voted for 10.
    6 would be a close second. 9 looks pretty cool, too.

  5. #20
    Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    18,747

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Koriand'r View Post
    Nice try, but no.
    I respect your aesthetic perspective. I wouldn't have given this so much thought if I didn't. And I can appreciate that if you were designing a decal you might cheat the image to make it functional. But I wasn't making a "nice try." I was using actual science and a long tradition of drafting to explain why the lettering made sense to the letterer. To give me a flat "no"--as if I'm stupid and I don't know what I'm talking about--that's not showing me the same respect that I have showed you. Good day.

  6. #21
    Astonishing Member Koriand'r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    3,796

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Kelly View Post
    I respect your aesthetic perspective. I wouldn't have given this so much thought if I didn't. And I can appreciate that if you were designing a decal you might cheat the image to make it functional. But I wasn't making a "nice try." I was using actual science and a long tradition of drafting to explain why the lettering made sense to the letterer. To give me a flat "no"--as if I'm stupid and I don't know what I'm talking about--that's not showing me the same respect that I have showed you. Good day.
    I wasn't trying to disrespect you, but you came off as extremely condescending and it sounded a whole lot like mansplaining. I'm an artist, I've designed a few logos in my time and anyway you slice it the letters should be uniformly aligned. After giving it more thought the red of the o should touch the next letter just way the red shadow of Woman does. Sorry that you're offended, you have a good day too.

  7. #22
    Extraordinary Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    5,013

    Default

    1, 2, 7

    10 characters
    Keep in mind that you have about as much chance of changing my mind as I do of changing yours.

  8. #23
    Astonishing Member Thirteen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    4,921

    Default

    I voted 5 as the best but in the process of looking around, saw THIS for the first time. The 80th anniversary logo. Might be something to be made from this at some point.
    Protected by the Comics Code Authority
    YES Capes. YES Masks. YES Secret Identities.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •