Batman is one of the world's most popular superheroes, but for the past couple of decades, especially in the wake of the recession and Occupy Wall Street, he has become one of the few superheroes being taken to task over his wealth and status. Specifically, how he could or should be using his money to be helping Gotham as opposed to being Batman and fighting criminals. Now to be fair, he does in fact donate millions to charities and most of the people he fights are supervillains who won't care about stuff like economic inequality, but the real question is why the question is still be asked?
Here is an article :https://www.avclub.com/matt-reeves-t...yne-1848661503