Originally Posted by
FrenchGemini
West: Pattinson should take it easily, better combat training and armor against West's brawling and spandex. Unless there is some relevant Bat-Spray I missed in West's utility Belt.
Keaton: Pattinson is taller, and has better armor. Depends on whether or not you consider Keaton being a bullet-timer. As I said on other threads, him having one bullet-timing feat in two movies while getting tagged several times is not enough for me, hence Battinson winning that one in my book.
Kilmer/Clooney: I do remember both of those guys being more agile than Battinson, I'd need to recheck those guys, it's been a while since I watched those two movies.
Bale: Bale is stronger (more consistently one-hit KOing people, lifting the armored, Liam Neeson-sized Ra's with one arm while Battinson needed Gordon's help to lift that corrupt cop on the Batsignal building), does better against multiple opponents. Battinson does have the armor advantage here. Still, a majority to Bale, with Pattinson taking maybe 2, 3 max out of 10 with the Rocky strategy for now.
Batfleck: Batfleck stomps, significantly better strength and skill, taking 2 dozen mercs bought with Lex Luthor money, right after a difficult fight against Superman (even taking Kryptonite into account) is better than taking down a dozen Dark Web Twitch subscribers and needing adrenaline to finish that fight. I'd say Pattinson is still better armored globally speaking, but it's much closer than the others (remember those two headshots Batfleck took at point-blank range?)
Fight 2: The Pattmobile is not that impressive, so far, as far as Batmobiles go. I'd give it to either the Tumbler's superior weaponry or the Fleckmobile's durability.