I'd say the last sentence pretty much sums up why it's problematic as well as why it isn't seen as scientifically valid.
Being a slave is by definition submitting yourself to master. The act of slavery itself is inherently evil, there is no such thing as a "good" slave master.Why is that sexist? She's saying you shouldn't be a slave to any master (man) or evil woman (like the villain Paula).
I took issue with the term largely because it seemed to be only to emphasize the bdsm stuff. I can take it or leave it, it's people's obsession with this comic's bdsm roots that frankly just annoy me because it seems to be an albatross around Diana's neck.You said you might perhaps agree with my description of Diana's morality in combat, but you disliked my use of BDSM terminology. But I wasn't using BDSM terminology, I was using Wrestling terminology. Even if you don't think Diana should use those fighting techniques, it's helpful to use that terminology when describing how she thinks about combat.
I'm not against Diana using subduing techniques. My argument is that this does not reflect the entirety or even majority of her fighting style.
Peace and evolution are not mutually exclusive. The Perez run specifically points out that one can instigate the other.