"Never assign to malice what is adequately explained by stupidity or ignorance."
"Great stories will always return to their original forms"
"Nobody is more dangerous than he who imagines himself pure in heart; for his purity, by definition, is unassailable." James Baldwin
It seems it'll be up to Gunn and Safran to make a new contract with Henry Cavill. They are currently mapping out the next 8/10 years of DC projects and I assume a 10-year long arc involving Superman.
"NO ONE knows what’s happening at DC Studios right now other than me & Peter. That would include writing up any new contracts for anyone at this point."
https://twitter.com/JamesGunn/status...99376384638976
Going forward, with few exceptions, it sounds the DCU will be connected across multiple media. The DCU Superman mythos could be expanded via live action or animated series (heck, even videogames!) with Cavill's Supes eventually popping up over there too.
James Gunn just posted a Kingdom Come related pic with the caption "Making plans": https://www.instagram.com/p/ClmKshmvYua/
Last edited by Last Son of Krypton; 11-30-2022 at 01:00 PM.
Definitely a tease. Funny how the “endgame” for Cavill might end up being the story that leans heavy on the “Superman as an angel/god” imagery even with Snyder out of the picture. Maybe they’ll bring Adams back for MoS2 but kill her off to help set KC up? Not exactly what I want but at this point this shared universe is a total wash and can never give me *my* Superman.
For when my rants on the forums just aren’t enough: https://thevindicativevordan.tumblr.com/
For when my rants on the forums just aren’t enough: https://thevindicativevordan.tumblr.com/
More about the ambiguity surrounding Cavill in the post-Flash universe (he got paid for a pointless cameo with no spoken lines, yay!):
"Regarding Cavill I’ll say this. The movie doesn’t answer his fate. The ‘full extent’ of changes in the new timeline is left ambiguous"
https://twitter.com/FlashFilmNews/st...71020900470784
"For the record, I've heard Cavill is in the movie very briefly but not in the final reboot timeline scene, and there's a meta crack from Barry referencing his absence.
Also heard the (apparently very funny) mid-credits scene with a drunken, confused Arthur being confused that Supergirl used to be Superman has been cut"
https://twitter.com/ViewerAnon/statu...53816583438336
That scene was meant to establish that there's no Superman in the new DCU. If they cut it, and Blue Beetle keeps the references to Superman, then I think we can go back to assuming that Cavill is the guy once more. Only question I have is if Cavill shot a brief cameo or if VA is just referring to the archive footage they were always rumored to be using.
For when my rants on the forums just aren’t enough: https://thevindicativevordan.tumblr.com/
They still had Superman referenced post-Flash when that scene was in. It doesn't change much, it was ambiguous about Superman then, it is still ambiguous about Superman now without a "visual reference" of the actor at the end, and the audience left wondering what's up with Supes and to wait some more movies to find out. Make The Flash feels incomplete if it'll be released this way.
The archive footages from MoS on a TV screen is long gone, it was a placeholder to give the idea SM was busy saving the world. The actual scene is a newscast about Superman saving people from some disaster. I mentioned it this Summer in this thread.
Yeah he was “referenced” as in:
Flash: Hey remember Superman?
Aquaman: Who the **** is Superman?
Flash: Supergirl used to be Superman back in the previous timeline
Aquaman: Well good for her
I’m not sure how much more clarity you needed on what the intent was short of Hamada walking on screen and holding up a sign at the camera that says “Cavill has been erased from the DCU, for all your Superman needs go check out the Abrams/Coates upcoming project!”
They were not bringing Cavill back, Hamada fought against his return, and they weren’t going to recast Superman either, it was just going to be Supergirl. This is different because now they’re not keeping the scene that makes it so people walking out will ask “did Superman get deleted?”. Instead they just don’t address it all and will leave it for Gunn/Safran and presumably Cavill to address what his status will be.
Is he actually in that scene? As in we see him on screen saving people? Because I can’t imagine Cavill would shoot a cameo if they planned on erasing him.
For when my rants on the forums just aren’t enough: https://thevindicativevordan.tumblr.com/
Aquaman didn't say who the **** is Superman. I don't get where you picked this dialogue from. Source?
And I meant Superman being already referenced in a post-Flash movie before Cavill came back.
Nope, Cavill wasn't in the newscast scene back then (July). I think it was to give the idea Superman was busy at the beginning when Batfleck asks help to deal with a group of terrorists in Gotham and Barry goes there.
I have no idea where Cavill is added now. There was that scene and the MoS' flashback from Barry's pov in the middle of the movie, if he got added to pre-existent scenes like happened for BA.
Last edited by Last Son of Krypton; 12-07-2022 at 02:27 PM.
Actually, I would mind. I hate the idea of WB profiting off Reeve likeness in the movie after what they did to him. I hate when Disney does it too. The Princess Leia in Rise of the Skywalker is probably the most depressing and jarring thing I've seen in film. Depressing because we didn't get to see Luke and Leia actually interact while she was alive. Jarring because it was so Uncanny Valley. Just bring Routh back as Superman for Christopher Reeve.