By the parameters of the event, which Wells completely ignored, Peter should have failed because the Progenitor appears to judge people by the standards they hold for themselves. So Cap was judged by an avatar of himself in his original 1940s costume and failed because his standard is a mythical USA that is a beacon of hope and goodness in the world. Daredevil was judged by an avatar of Jesus Christ and failed for not living up to his faith.
Cyclops, on the other hand, said only his wife could judge him and refused to be judged by the Progenitor; he passed. An avatar of Captain Marvel tried to tempt Kamala Khan (the real one, not whoever that person was in ASM) by saying she could save Kamala and her family by taking them into space; Kamala pounded the avatar into the ground and demanded to know what it did with the real Carol. She passed.
Peter, by working with Norman, fails the real Gwen. And would have failed Uncle Ben, who by the parameters of the event should have been the avatar.
I know there was a lot of gobbley-gook circular rationalizing done by Peter (Peter wanted to do something so rash/dangerous/illegal/immoral/bad no one would help him, so he asked Norman - but then he told the Progenitor he has to work with Norman so Norman won't do bad again to honor Gwen - but Peter, YOU asked Norman to help you with the bad thing you did! So if you don't want Norman to do bad...then why did you pull him into YOUR bad thing?! Yeah, right, you're doing this out of love for Gwen :rolleyes) but it's circular and doesn't track.
And besides, only Norman is responsible for Norman's actions. It's really weird and not a little offputting for Wells to make Peter think his "responsibility" extends to exerting controlling over other people's choices and morals. It reminds me of Slott's "No one will die" vow, which was also stupid and irrational - Peter's not God, he has no control over whether people die or not - and I don't know why the BND writers default to this bizarre characterization of Peter believing it is his place to play deity with other people's agency.
Couple that with Wells turning Peter into someone who refuses to hold others responsible for the harm they caused - he let Tombstone walk free even though he knows Tombstone mass murdered the Crime Master's Men, he basically pats Vulture on the head despite all the property damage he caused, and then he tells JJJ in this issue it's okay he created the Scorpion and the Spider-Slayers because JJJ is a good guy and his intentions have always been pure which is very much not true, and also negates all of JJJ's character development - and I fail to understand why people praise Wells's Peter as to me he doesn't understand the first thing about Peter Parker. Wells mistakes responsibility for unthinking forgiveness and turning a blind eye to others' transgressions - if Wells had written Amazing Fantasy 15, it would have ended with Peter letting the Burglar go and telling him it's okay the Burglar shot Uncle Ben, Peter knows the Burglar's intentions were good so Peter is going to let the Burglar off with a warning to play more nicely next time.