Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 92

Thread: ASM 13 Preview

  1. #16
    Formerly Assassin Spider Huntsman Spider's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    New Jersey, U.S.A.
    Posts
    21,544

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frontier View Post
    Can't wait until the return of Daniel Kingsley as the true Hobgoblin!

    Also can I just mention how much I hated how Slott would never give Peter a clear win against Urich? SpOck did worse to him than Peter ever did.
    Exposing him as the new Hobgoblin and all that . . . and then wrecking him with the nano-spider-tracers inside his bloodstream. I remember. Fun times. Well, not really.
    The spider is always on the hunt.

  2. #17
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    2,691

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Refrax5 View Post
    I feel like they brought back Ned and gave him the Goblin serum for a reason. My guess is that Kingsley is going to die and Ned is going to be the main Hobgoblin from now on.
    Which is ironic, since Marvel (and Roger Stern) went through so much effort retconning Ned as never having been Hobgoblin and establishing Kingsley as having been Hobby all along in ‘Hobgoblin Lives’… of course, that was back when most characters stayed dead.

    Not sure whether it’s a “hot take”, but even though Hobby being Ned was supposedly a botched, last minute reveal that Marvel cobbled together (forget if it was PAD, Owsley/Priest or DeFalco who decided on it) after Stern left… I always preferred it to him being Kingsley. I’ve said it before, but Kingsley is just like a less interesting Diet Norman. Ned at least had that personal dynamic with Peter and Betty. Even though I still don’t think he should’ve been brought back, if he’s reinstated as the only Hobgoblin he will at least be interesting again.

  3. #18
    Moderator Frontier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    115,962

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HypnoHustler View Post
    Which is ironic, since Marvel (and Roger Stern) went through so much effort retconning Ned as never having been Hobgoblin and establishing Kingsley as having been Hobby all along in ‘Hobgoblin Lives’… of course, that was back when most characters stayed dead.

    Not sure whether it’s a “hot take”, but even though Hobby being Ned was supposedly a botched, last minute reveal that Marvel cobbled together (forget if it was PAD, Owsley/Priest or DeFalco who decided on it) after Stern left… I always preferred it to him being Kingsley. I’ve said it before, but Kingsley is just like a less interesting Diet Norman. Ned at least had that personal dynamic with Peter and Betty. Even though I still don’t think he should’ve been brought back, if he’s reinstated as the only Hobgoblin he will at least be interesting again.
    But I feel like Kingsley zigging where Norman zaggs is part of what made the Hobgoblin work, and the personality in his civilian identity fit more than Ned, raging husband, Leeds.

    At least to me.

  4. #19
    The Superior Spider-clone SpideyClone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    340

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frontier View Post
    Can't wait until the return of Daniel Kingsley as the true Hobgoblin!

    Also can I just mention how much I hated how Slott would never give Peter a clear win against Urich? SpOck did worse to him than Peter ever did.
    I think it's going to be Daniel too. Payback for Roderick's abuse over the years, and Norman, well just because...lol

  5. #20
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    2,691

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frontier View Post
    But I feel like Kingsley zigging where Norman zaggs is part of what made the Hobgoblin work, and the personality in his civilian identity fit more than Ned, raging husband, Leeds.

    At least to me.
    To each their own! Personally I found Kingsley as interesting as drywall.

  6. #21
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    3,601

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frontier View Post
    Also can I just mention how much I hated how Slott would never give Peter a clear win against Urich? SpOck did worse to him than Peter ever did.
    How many clear wins did Spider-Man have against Hobgoblin in Roger Stern's run? Or Green Goblin in Lee/Ditko's run? The common complaint about the Jason Macendale Hobgoblin was that he was an ineffective goon.

    The Phil Urich Hobgoblin was positioned as a formidable adversary.

  7. #22
    Fantastic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Posts
    310

    Default

    A Kingsley brainwash could a fitting punishment considering how many time he has done it to someone else.
    Last edited by Xwho; 11-04-2022 at 08:38 PM.

  8. #23
    Moderator Frontier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    115,962

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lee View Post
    How many clear wins did Spider-Man have against Hobgoblin in Roger Stern's run? Or Green Goblin in Lee/Ditko's run? The common complaint about the Jason Macendale Hobgoblin was that he was an ineffective goon.

    The Phil Urich Hobgoblin was positioned as a formidable adversary.
    I think one time he went pretty savage on Sterns' Hobby (and obviously beat him in Hobgoblin Lives) and got clean hits on Green Gobby, but it came off to me that Slott was playing favorites with Urich, especially since it continued up until his last appearance where by then you'd just want Spidey to wreck him and web him up.

  9. #24
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Feb 2022
    Posts
    2,642

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HypnoHustler View Post
    Which is ironic, since Marvel (and Roger Stern) went through so much effort retconning Ned as never having been Hobgoblin and establishing Kingsley as having been Hobby all along in ‘Hobgoblin Lives’… of course, that was back when most characters stayed dead.

    Not sure whether it’s a “hot take”, but even though Hobby being Ned was supposedly a botched, last minute reveal that Marvel cobbled together (forget if it was PAD, Owsley/Priest or DeFalco who decided on it) after Stern left… I always preferred it to him being Kingsley. I’ve said it before, but Kingsley is just like a less interesting Diet Norman. Ned at least had that personal dynamic with Peter and Betty. Even though I still don’t think he should’ve been brought back, if he’s reinstated as the only Hobgoblin he will at least be interesting again.
    I know, although at least Hobgoblin Lives still left Ned as being crazy and acting as the Hobgoblin a number of times. So while he wasn't "the" Hobgoblin, he was still "a" Hobgoblin of sorts.

  10. #25
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Feb 2022
    Posts
    2,642

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HypnoHustler View Post
    To each their own! Personally I found Kingsley as interesting as drywall.
    Yeah. I always loved Hobgoblin until it was Kingsley, who was so bland. I guess the idea of Hobgoblin being sort Osborn-esque might have merit, but I always thought Macendale and Ned just seemed more interesting. Kingsley was only cool as long as he was in costume.

  11. #26
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    3,601

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frontier View Post
    I think one time he went pretty savage on Sterns' Hobby (and obviously beat him in Hobgoblin Lives) and got clean hits on Green Gobby, but it came off to me that Slott was playing favorites with Urich, especially since it continued up until his last appearance where by then you'd just want Spidey to wreck him and web him up.
    Then Ditko was "playing favorites" with Green Goblin and Stern was "playing favorites" with Hobgoblin, because they always escaped and were generally more successful than other villains. Was John Romita playing favorites with Kingpin? Was J M DeMatteis playing favorites with Kraven? ("Oh no! Spider-Man got jobbed by a D-lister!")

    Writers tell stories. Not all characters have to be equal. It's more interesting if they're not. Screwball can get defeated in the first two pages. Hobgoblin can give Spider-Man a beating and get away scot-free. There doesn't need to be parity. Different characters serve different purposes and different stories have different types of resolutions (or cliffhangers).

  12. #27
    Formerly Assassin Spider Huntsman Spider's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    New Jersey, U.S.A.
    Posts
    21,544

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frontier View Post
    I think one time he went pretty savage on Sterns' Hobby (and obviously beat him in Hobgoblin Lives) and got clean hits on Green Gobby, but it came off to me that Slott was playing favorites with Urich, especially since it continued up until his last appearance where by then you'd just want Spidey to wreck him and web him up.
    Wasn't Phil's last appearance technically him getting gruesomely killed by a Carnage-bonded/enhanced Norman Osborn?
    The spider is always on the hunt.

  13. #28
    Fantastic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Posts
    310

    Default

    What time do the early leaks and/or spoilers usually happen around?

  14. #29
    Mighty Member Alex_Of_X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2022
    Posts
    1,419

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Huntsman Spider View Post
    Wasn't Phil's last appearance technically him getting gruesomely killed by a Carnage-bonded/enhanced Norman Osborn?
    Yo when was that?! Around King in Black?

  15. #30
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    2,691

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alex_Of_X View Post
    Yo when was that?! Around King in Black?
    Go Down Swinging, last Slott arc iirc.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •