I'm mostly indifferent to Joker 2. It looks like the cinematography will be on point and I'm sure audiences will enjoy it, but I don't need more un-Jokered Arthur Fleck or "stripped down" & remixed versions of these characters. Hopefully this film is more focused narratively, as the first one tried to say too many things at once IMO.
I like this logo but don't associate it with the character angle Gunn is probably going for.
For when my rants on the forums just aren’t enough: https://thevindicativevordan.tumblr.com/
It's pretty good, and it's probably a good thing to have a distinctive symbol, but if I'm being honest, I think the bottom yellow area looks too empty. The Kingdom Come symbol usually looks slightly better in this department, though it depends. Probably won't matter too much, especially since the problem probably won't be present at every angle.
Small Screen Superman (www.sssuperman.com) - my Superman fansite. Go there for blog posts, Superman hangman, Superman crossword puzzles, and more!
I was going to say the same - my design brain just wishes where was something on the bottom to indicate the "tail" of the S. That simplified design really worked for KC Superman because with the black background, it was a harsh design which indicated his frame of mind after losing so much. In general, I think it's fine - it certainly makes more sense as a Kryptonian symbol that the classic "S" does after they actually created a Kryptonian language which for some reason doesn't have any of the design aesthetic of his S shield, the one thing they could've used to reverse-engineer what the Kryptonian language looked like.
I like the logo. Oddly enough I didn't even think of Kingdom Come when I first saw it.