Originally Posted by
Mel Dyer
Couldn't disagree more.
Morrison's Superwoman was a sexy, brilliant, passionate, independent and sexually empowered and powerful supervillainess and major turn-on for any red-blooded heterosexual male, young or old, who read E2. Anyone, straight or similarly oriented, can attest to enjoying other aspects of the character and the story, she was featured in -the action, the conflict, superpowers, etc - as much as the things about her, we thought were sexy.
There's nothing wrong with creating a female character, who is sexually exciting to straight men, and nothing shameful about being excited by Superwoman. Furthermore, being turned on by her, Dark Phoenix, Wonder Woman or any female character in a fictional work doesn't mean you are intellectually incapable of enjoying other aspects of that work or ANY media work, fiction or non-fiction.
I think dismissing how Superwoman and similar female characters are written, as inherently "wrong", ..is anti-feminist, anti-heterosexual and anti-male. It's not inclusive or progressive, in any way.
It's time we point out, here in our WW fan community, that everything in the media, which is affirmative of straight male interests (attraction to women) isn't wrong or criminal. Further, the condemnation of anything we see, which straight males find exciting, ..isn't automatically feminist, progressive, just ..or right. Or better.
This fifty-years long WW fan thinks Grant Morrison's Superwoman was way hot. No apologies (over here) for thinking that, ..and if you don't, that's your problem or your reality. It's not Grant Morrison's and not the problem of comic fans, who happen to be attracted to women.
Again, being anti-str8 or anti-man...not inclusive and not feminist.