Quote Originally Posted by Kaitou D. Kid View Post
If Wells' run ends with Peter and MJ still separated (and possibly with MJ still having the kids), it's going to be interesting if the next writer can ignore it in a flash the way Wells ignored Spencer, or if they'll have to work to undo the status quo.
Well, one of the strengths of the Peter/MJ relationship is that pro-Peter/MJ writers have never written it like it's the predestined one true romance. Only Quesada and Slott have written it that way. It's evolved as being two people who've grown together. So while anti-Peter/MJ writers have felt free to revert MJ's characterisation as necessary to break them up, pro-Peter/MJ writers have generally wanted to write them as growing back together organically.

Really, it's telling that Wells thinks that giving MJ kids (biological or not biological) may not be a permanent thing because the next writer can just undo it. There's no way that you can take the Peter/MJ relationship seriously and treat it as a thing where one of them having children is just something that they draw a line under and forget about.