Last edited by the illustrious mr. kenway; 02-12-2023 at 02:34 PM.
I wanna see a new take on X-statix. Yes, it was a trainwreck... but it's written as a tragic story, so being a train-wreck in-universe makes sense.
It could be argued those "best comics ever created" in regard to the X-men, are mainly those of the early 30 years up until Claremont left around X-men #3 and most from 1992 onward it was sadly very often mediocrity (as in not bad but not very memorable either) with the occasional stand out hit. Which means half of those 60 years is actualy somewhat detrimental rather than beneficial for the comics.
1992-2000 is often regarded as a rather "aimless" time and therefor seldomly referenced or has parts from it re-used. It's no suprise that during 00's it was often labeled as the "bad times".
Morrison's run as popular as it seemingly was with readers at the time, also heavily altered the core X-men into a shape (characterization and direction wise) they weren't known for.
House of M and Decimination, basicly destroyed the foundation of the X-men and enforced a status quo for more than 15 years that actualy goes contrary to how the X-men and their world are remembered by a wider audience.
Because the general image of the world of the X-men is one where the mutant population is slowly but steadily increasing, hence constant tension with normal humans, rather than them being close to dying out.
The less said about the current state of things the better (especialy considering my bias).
Obviously there were still some good stories everywhere during thse later 30 year period, but they largely failed to become the "modern classics" that would be referenced, remembered or adapted like many stories and moments of the previous 30 years.
Tellingly when adaptations pick from the comics, they mostly do so from those "golden years" of Claremont's run.
The destruction of Genosha and sudden death of 90% of the world's mutant population, Decimination, M-Pox, conflict with the Inhumans and perhaps even the current state of affairs simply don't seem to be particular enticing compared to the first 30 years of the X-men.
Considering how dystopic the last 23 years of continutiy have been. Wouldn't a new universe actualy need to go full blown utopic to actualy set itself appart from the mainline comics now?
Fair enough.
Perhaps the more ideal method would be to take the first 30 years as groundwork and then just deviate at the point around 1992 into new direction instead?
Or go...
...with the full Elseworld approach.
I loved Ultimate X-Men pre Ultimatum. I’d like to see more of those stories, the characters we all know but a bit modern and more realistic in terms of how people like that would actually be. Everyone said the UU was filled with jerks, problem is people with power that go through what the X-Men go through usually end up with a hard outer shell.
The post Ultimatum universe had some great stuff also (Miles!) but it never really hooked me like the first few years.
I'd probably set it in the Ultimate Universe after a timeskip or in the 23rd century.
Either way I'd do an imprint like Warren Ellis's the Wild Storm.
An initial miniseries to set the status quo and introduce the main players. It will be followed up by spinoff titles focusing on the players in following their own adventures. One of them will be the new X-men. .
Last edited by the illustrious mr. kenway; 02-13-2023 at 11:00 AM.