Wells or the writer after him will undo it (mid 2020's)
By the late 2020's
In the 2030's
In the 2040's
Never / Not until Spider-Man is fully public domain
This is semantic hair splitting and a straw man logical fallacy, which is drawing focus away from the original argument: people in positions of power over the artistic direction of Spider-Man and comics in general, be they someone who is a salaried employee or a freelancer, have demonstrated regressive views about woman and relationships.
I urge people to think rationally. Keeping a comic book character a certain age doesn't make the people who made that decision bigots. Keeping a comic book character unmarried doesn't make the people who made that decision bigots.
It's the same old thing over and over again - people made some comics you didn't like, therefore those people are immoral and have sinister motivations.
Take a step back. That's not a healthy response to disliking a comic book.
What are you talking about? What dots are you connecting here? What are you criticising me for? I am stating facts. I am explaining the difference between Marvel staff and freelancers. Most comic writers and artists are freelancers, not staff of the publishers. That is a fact. Not a rationale, not an argument, an irrefutable fact.
Folks, take a look at the thread title. That's what you need to focus your commentary on, not each other and not through rude & insulting assumptions of the creative staff's motivations. Keep it civil, do not get personal.
Conn Seanery
CBR Forums Administrator ~ Ron Swansonite ~ Brock Samson will show us the way
THE CBR COMMUNITY STANDARDS & RULES ~ Know them. Follow them. Love them.
"Hnh. Could Bowie have been a mutant?" ~Dr. Doom (Hellfire Gala 2022)
Just a inquiry...
Now that Spidey got erased from the Multiverse in Dan Slott's End of Spider-Verse, shouldn't the OMD deal been undone since it never took place?
"He's pure power and doesn't even know it. He's the best of us."-Matt Murdock
"I need a reason to take the mask off."-Peter Parker
"My heart half-breaks at how easy it is to lie to him. It breaks all the way when he believes me without question." Felicia Hardy
I was very confident Spencer would do it, when he didn't I was still hopeful because he had basically laid it all out for Marvel to do it, then Zeb Wells came in and did a total 180 and screwed the character like he hadn't been since OMD and has given us awful characterization for both Peter and MJ, I just hope his run ends and the next writer cleans up his mess, so we can have OMD undone by ASM #1000. Honestly I think if they're ever going to do it it will be in ASM #1000, if they don't do it that issue, I honestly don't think they ever will.
But I am still hopeful the plan is to do it in ASM #1000.
Would Spencer have been able to do it, though? Apparently, Marvel is still very anti-marriage behind the scenes, and, if after over a decade, the needle has shifted from "Peter/MJ was a huge mistake from day one" to "the Spider-Marriage is a cool non-canon premise, but being single is the most important trait of the canon Spider-Man" (despite how anti-OMD the franchise as a whole is) can't say I can see it coming back any time soon, milestone comic or not.
Doctor Strange: "You are the right person to replace Logan."
X-23: "I know there are people who disapprove... Guys on the Internet mainly."
(All-New Wolverine #4)
Late to the party here, but I think it's pretty evident by now that this is regarded a terrible story. I imagine it's only a matter of time before Marvel decides to score some free points by cashing in their reversal card
If I were an unscrupulous person, I'd take bets on this.
Last edited by Dan Slott; 03-12-2023 at 11:23 PM.